Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Great Satan vs. the Mad Mullahs

How the United States and Iran Demonize Each Other

Bibliographic Data

ID23149686
AuthorsW O Beeman (0000-0001-6058-0519, corresponding author)
Year2005
Publication date2005-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeBOOK
VenueThe Great Satan vs. the Mad Mullahs (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherGreenwood Publishing Group, Inc. (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5040/9798400659188
OpenAlexW4392074114
ISBN9798400659188
LanguageEN
Citations received25

The United States and Iran have been estranged for 25 years. They have carried out a mutual process of demonization that is unprecedented in modern history, based on cultural hot buttons that have the power to galvanize the populations of both countries. Iranian leaders have characterized the United States as the Great Satan—an evil corruptor that pollutes society and destroys personal morality. American leaders characterize the members of the current government of the Islamic Republic of Iran as Mad Mullahs, wild-eyed and irrational. Giving a thorough account of the background of U.S.-Iranian relations, Beeman claims that the current accusations of both Iran and the United States are baseless, consisting largely of public invective and symbolic rhetoric according to their own mythologies of evil. American leaders characterize the members of the current government of the Islamic Republic of Iran as Mad Mullahs, wild-eyed and irrational. They accuse them of fomenting the hostage crisis, in which American embassy personnel were held for 444 days at the end of the Carter administration, dealing a severe blow to U.S. national honor. The Bush administration has further accused the Iranians of being part of an Axis of Evil on the basis of their alleged support of terrorists, oppression of women and minorities, and development of nuclear weapons. Giving a thorough account of the background of U.S.-Iranian relations, Beeman claims that the current accusations of both Iran and the United States are baseless, consisting largely of public invective and symbolic rhetoric according to their own mythologies of evil.

History · Islamic Studies and History

  • Seeing Like an Orientalist State

    Open Access•Justin Turner•Critical Criminology•2015

  • Discursive Foundations of Iran's Nuclear Policy

    Open Access•Homeira Moshirzadeh, Moshirzadeh Homeira•Security Dialogue•2007

  • Anatomies of Revolution

    Open Access•George Lawson•Anatomies of Revolution•2019

  • Gulf Society

    Open Access•W O Beeman•Persian Gulf in History•2009

  • Stigmatization or Victimization? The Iran–US Nuclear Relationship from 2015 to 2021

    Open Access•Aniruddha Saha•Journal of Global Security Studies•2024

  • İran’da Muhafazakârlar ve Reformistler Arasında Siyasal Mücadelenin Dönüşen Dinamikleri

    Open Access•Alper Kasımoğlu•İran Çalışmaları Dergisi•2025

  • The New York Times ’ presentation of Iran’s government in news articles before and after the nuclear deal

    Open Access•Mehrnaz Khanjani•Newspaper Research Journal•2020

  • Islam and security narratives in Eurasia

    Mohiaddin Mesbahi•Caucasus Survey•2013

  • Beyond Orientalism

    Sasan Aghlani•Middle East Critique•2024

  • Discourse and violence

    Arshin Adib-Moghaddam•Critical Studies on Terrorism•2009

  • Realist Foreign Policy Analysis with a Twist

    Open Access•Keith Smith•Foreign Policy Analysis•2014

  • Controlling the discourse

    Jason B Jones•Critical Discourse Studies•2010

  • The good, the bad, and the ugly

    Open Access•Anna Geis, Carmen Wunderlich•International Politics•2014

  • Devil on the doorstep v. bandits in the backyard

    Mohammad Samiei, Janice Webster•Contemporary Politics•2023

  • Iran’s antisemitism and anti-Zionism

    Ofira Seliktar•Israel Affairs•2022

  • Disagree and you shall be valued

    Sameera Durrani•Social Semiotics•2020

  • Changing Palestine–Israel Ecologies

    M M J Fischer•Cultural Politics an International…•2006

  • Dealing or Dueling with the United States? Explaining and Predicting Iranian Behavior during the Nuclear Crisis

    Open Access•Balkan Devlen•International Studies Review•2010

  • Hidāyat’s Libidinal Hell

    Open Access•Arshavez Mozafari•Iranian Studies•2016

  • Unworthy victims and threatening adversaries

    Open Access•Evan W Sandlin, Daniel J Simmons•Social Science Quarterly•2022

  • Practicing Radical Geopolitics

    Julien Mercille, Alun Jones•Annals of the Association of…•2009

  • Iran v ‘the international community

    Shampa Biswa, Shampa Biswas•Asian Journal of Political Science•2018

  • The carcass of dead policies

    Donette Murray•Contemporary Politics•2010

  • A Crisis of Confidence Revisited

    Open Access•Maysam Behravesh•Asian Politics & Policy•2011

  • Iran and theUnitedStates

    Open Access•Mohammad Soltaninejad•Asian Politics & Policy•2015

Unique citing works25
Citations per year1,25
Citation span2006 - 2025 (20)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 23

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae