The Great Satan vs. the Mad Mullahs
How the United States and Iran Demonize Each Other
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23149686 |
|---|---|
| Authors | W O Beeman (0000-0001-6058-0519, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2005 |
| Publication date | 2005-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | The Great Satan vs. the Mad Mullahs (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc. (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5040/9798400659188 |
| OpenAlex | W4392074114 |
| ISBN | 9798400659188 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 25 |
The United States and Iran have been estranged for 25 years. They have carried out a mutual process of demonization that is unprecedented in modern history, based on cultural hot buttons that have the power to galvanize the populations of both countries. Iranian leaders have characterized the United States as the Great Satan—an evil corruptor that pollutes society and destroys personal morality. American leaders characterize the members of the current government of the Islamic Republic of Iran as Mad Mullahs, wild-eyed and irrational. Giving a thorough account of the background of U.S.-Iranian relations, Beeman claims that the current accusations of both Iran and the United States are baseless, consisting largely of public invective and symbolic rhetoric according to their own mythologies of evil. American leaders characterize the members of the current government of the Islamic Republic of Iran as Mad Mullahs, wild-eyed and irrational. They accuse them of fomenting the hostage crisis, in which American embassy personnel were held for 444 days at the end of the Carter administration, dealing a severe blow to U.S. national honor. The Bush administration has further accused the Iranians of being part of an Axis of Evil on the basis of their alleged support of terrorists, oppression of women and minorities, and development of nuclear weapons. Giving a thorough account of the background of U.S.-Iranian relations, Beeman claims that the current accusations of both Iran and the United States are baseless, consisting largely of public invective and symbolic rhetoric according to their own mythologies of evil.
Seeing Like an Orientalist State
Discursive Foundations of Iran's Nuclear Policy
Anatomies of Revolution
Gulf Society
Stigmatization or Victimization? The Iran–US Nuclear Relationship from 2015 to 2021
İran’da Muhafazakârlar ve Reformistler Arasında Siyasal Mücadelenin Dönüşen Dinamikleri
The New York Times ’ presentation of Iran’s government in news articles before and after the nuclear deal
Islam and security narratives in Eurasia
Beyond Orientalism
Discourse and violence
Realist Foreign Policy Analysis with a Twist
Controlling the discourse
The good, the bad, and the ugly
Devil on the doorstep v. bandits in the backyard
Iran’s antisemitism and anti-Zionism
Disagree and you shall be valued
Changing Palestine–Israel Ecologies
Dealing or Dueling with the United States? Explaining and Predicting Iranian Behavior during the Nuclear Crisis
Hidāyat’s Libidinal Hell
Unworthy victims and threatening adversaries
Practicing Radical Geopolitics
Iran v ‘the international community
The carcass of dead policies
A Crisis of Confidence Revisited
Iran and theUnitedStates
| Unique citing works | 25 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,25 |
| Citation span | 2006 - 2025 (20) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 23 |