Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Respecting Human Dignity

Contract Versus Capabilities

Bibliographic Data

ID23150830
AuthorsCynthia A Stark (0000-0003-2490-2204, University of Utah, corresponding author)
Year2009
Volume40
Issue3-4
Pages366-381
Publication date2009-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMetaphilosophy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0026-1068 • E-ISSN: 1467-9973
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01605.x
OpenAlexW2100432702
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited29

There appears to be a tension between two commitments in liberalism. The first is that citizens, as rational agents possessing dignity, are owed a justification for principles of justice. The second is that members of society who do not meet the requirements of rational agency are owed justice. These notions conflict because the first commitment is often expressed through the device of the social contract, which seems to confine the scope of justice to rational agents. So, contractarianism seems to ignore the justice claims of the severely cognitively impaired. To solve this problem, Martha Nussbaum proposes the capabilities approach. The justifiability condition, on this approach, is met by the idea of overlapping consensus. This essay argues that overlapping consensus cannot meet liberalism's justifiability condition, nor is it more inclusive of the cognitively impaired. Therefore, we have reason to retain the contract device and look for another way to ensure that liberalism respects the justice claims of all.

Agency (philosophy) · Contractualism · Dignity · Economic Justice · Law and economics · Liberalism · Political science · Politics · Scope (computer science) · Social contract · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · Free Will and Agency · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Political Philosophy and Ethics

  • An Agency‐Based Capability Theory of Justice

    Open Access•Romy Claassen, Rutger Claassen•European Journal of Philosophy•2017

  • Capabilities in a Just Society

    Open Access•Romy Claassen, Rutger Claassen•Capabilities in a Just Society•2018

  • The Contribution of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning through Self-reflection and Knowledge Sharing

    Open Access•Pulane Adelaide Molomo•E-Journal of Humanities Arts and…•2024

  • Luck, opportunity and disability

    Cynthia A Stark•Critical Review of International…•2013

  • A life of one’s own

    Jurgen De Wispelaere, David Casassas•Disability & Society•2013

  • Capability without dignity

    Open Access•Joseph J Fischel, Claire Mckinney•Contemporary Political Theory•2020

  • Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics

    Norman Daniels•The Journal of Philosophy•1979

  • At the Margins of Moral Personhood

    Eva Feder Kittay•Ethics•2005

  • The Reasonable in Justice as Fairness

    Open Access•Jon Mandle•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•1999

  • Justice for the Disabled

    Open Access•Christie Hartley•Journal of Social Philosophy•2009

  • Duties of Justice to Citizens With Cognitive Disabilities

    Open Access•Sophia Isako Wong•Metaphilosophy•2009

  • A Theory of Justice

    John Rawls•Theory of Justice•1971

  • Political Liberalism and Respect

    Martha C Nussbaum•SATS•2003

  • The Justification of Political Liberalism

    Open Access•Daniel M Weinstock, Daniel Weinstock•Pacific philosophical quarterly•1994

  • Love’s Labor

    Eva Feder Kittay•Love's Labor•2019

  • A Rawlsian Perspective on Justice for the Disabled

    Open Access•Adam Cureton, Philosophy Documentation Center•Essays in Philosophy•2008

  • Respect, Pluralism, and Justice

    Thomas E Hill•Respect, Pluralism, and Justice•2000

  • The Moral Personhood of Individuals Labeled “Mentally Retarded”

    Sophia Isako Wong•Social Theory and Practice•2007

  • Varieties of Feminist Liberalism

    Amy R Baehr•Feminist Constructions•2004

  • Frontiers of Justice

    Open Access•Martha C Nussbaum, Martha Nussbaum•Frontiers of Justice•2007

  • Theories of Justice

    Brian Barry•Theories of Justice•1989

  • Political Liberalism and Public Reason

    Onora O’neill, Onora O'Neill•The Philosophical Review•1997

  • Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements

    Martha C Nussbaum, Martha Nussbaum•Feminist Economics•2003

  • How to Include the Severely Disabled in a Contractarian Theory of Justice

    Open Access•Cynthia A Stark•Journal of Political Philosophy•2007

  • Political Liberalism and Respect

    Open Access•Han Van Wietmarschen•Journal of Political Philosophy•2020

  • On Hearing Women's Voices

    Open Access•Martha C Nussbaum•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2004

  • What is reasonableness

    Open Access•James W Boettcher•Philosophy & Social Criticism•2004

  • Contractarianism, Other‐regarding Attitudes, and the Moral Standing of Nonhuman Animals

    Open Access•Andrew I Cohen•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2007

  • Hypothetical Consent and Justification

    Cynthia A Stark•The Journal of Philosophy•2000

  • Contractarianism and cooperation

    Open Access•Cynthia A Stark•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2009

  • Poverty, Well‐Being, and Gender

    Open Access•Susan Moller Okin•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2003

  • Feminism and Liberalism Revisited

    Open Access•A Phillips•Constellations•2001

  • Women and Human Development

    Open Access•Martha C Nussbaum, Martha Nussbaum•Women and Human Development•2000

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,46
Citation span2013 - 2024 (12)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae