Is Aristotle's Definition of Change Circular?
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23152128 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert Heinaman (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1994 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 1994-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Apeiron (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-6390 • E-ISSN: 2156-7093 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/apeiron.1994.27.1.25 |
| OpenAlex | W2079834286 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
La definition aristotelicienne du changement dans « La Physique » III peut etre critiquee pour sa circularite. D'apres l'A., la nouvelle interpretation de la definition avancee par certains philosophes pour sa defense devrait etre rejetee
Epistemology · History of philosophy · Humanities · Interpretation (philosophy) · Linguistics · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,19 |
| Citation span | 2005 - 2021 (17) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |