Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Conclusions and Implications

Bibliographic Data

ID23154543
AuthorsIan Bache (0000-0002-2149-210X), Matthew Flinders (0000-0003-3585-9010)
Year2004
Pages195-206
Publication date2004-02-26
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeCHAPTER
VenueMulti-level governance (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/0199259259.003.0012
OpenAlexW4250258120
ISBN9780199259250
LanguageEN
Citations received11

Ian Bache and Matthew Flinders reflect on the value of multi‐level governance as both an analytical and normative concept. They suggest that the critical normative challenge is that of legitimacy in the context of multi‐level governance, which demands new means to connect citizens more effectively with the shifting locations of power. In analytical terms, they argue for a clear distinction to be made between multi‐level governance and multi‐level participation, where the latter notion signals greater involvement without effective influence for at least some types of new actors. Pursuing this line of reasoning, they suggest that they highlight the danger of multi‐level governance incorporating neo‐pluralist assumptions in relation to the location and fluidity of power that fail to address the continuing existence of underlying structural inequalities.

Context (archaeology) · Corporate governance · Economics · Epistemology · Geography · Law and economics · Legitimacy · Management · Normative · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Power (physics) · Sociology · Value (mathematics) · Computer Science · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics

  • Multilevel Governance and Participation

    Marko Nousiainen, Katariina Mäkinen et al.•European Politics and Society•2014

  • The governance of transport and climate change

    Open Access•George Marsden, Tom Rye•Journal of Transport Geography•2009

  • Practices and actions stimulating responsible digitalisation in Värmland

    Open Access•Malin Stegmann McCallion•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2025

  • City Diplomacy as a Mechanism of Multi-Level Solidarity and Support for Ukraine

    Open Access•Natalia Matiaszczyk•Journal of Eurasian Studies•2024

  • The ‘local turn’ in historical perspective

    Open Access•Sarah Hackett, Sarah E Hackett•International Review of…•2015

  • Reconciling Cohesion and Competitiveness Through Eu Cluster Policies

    Lisa De Propris•Policy Studies•2007

  • The open method of co-ordination and national parliaments

    Francesco Duina, Tapio Raunio•Journal of European Public Policy•2007

  • You do what you have to do? Salience and territorial interest representation in EU environmental affairs

    Open Access•Michaël Tatham•European Union Politics•2012

  • The capacity to co-ordinate – Whitehall, governance and the challenge of climate change

    Open Access•Felicity Matthews•Public Policy and Administration•2012

  • Le respect des droits des peuples autochtones dans le régime forestier québécois

    Sara Teitelbaum•Recherches sociographiques•2015

  • Multi-level governance and migration politics in the Arab world

    Tamirace Fakhoury•New Community•2019

Unique citing works11
Citations per year0.58
Citation span2007 - 2025 (19)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11

Tools

Open DOILibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae