Bruno Latour and the Ontological Dissolution of Nature in the Social Sciences

A Critical Review

Bibliographic Data

ID23163003
AuthorsJacques Pollini (Social Dimensions of Environmental Policy Department of Geography Davenport Hall, 607 South Mathews Avenue University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Urbana, IL 61801, USA, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume22
Issue1
Pages25-42
Publication date2013-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Values (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0963-2719 • E-ISSN: 1752-7015
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.3197/096327113x13528328798192
OpenAlexW2322262053
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited29

The concept of nature is central in any reflection about the relationships between humans and their environment. It is frequently under attack, which created a divide in academia that might partly explain the science war of the 1990s and that is still latent. This article is an attempt to make a step ahead in this debate. It responds to the anti-essentialist critique of nature formulated by Bruno Latour in his influential book Politiques de la nature . It shows that nature as an objective nonsocial reality must be conceptualised and studied if the relationships between humans and their environment are to be properly understood and managed. It proposes a definition of the word nature that is compatible with both an essentialist view of nature and the nonseparation of nature and culture. Eventually, it argues that such a return to an essentialist view of nature does not imply the use of nature as a benchmark to measure morality.

Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Essentialism · Morality · Sociology · Environmental Philosophy and Ethics · French Urban and Social Studies · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub