Kant's Theory of Justice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23165751 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Allen D Rosen (corresponding author), Allen Rosen (0000-0003-0274-5703) |
| Year | 1996 |
| Pages | 240 |
| Publication date | 1996-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | Kant's Theory of Justice (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Cornell University Press (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.7591/9781501718717 |
| OpenAlex | W2066790571 |
| Open Library | OL33753244M |
| ISBN | 9781501718717 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 39 |
Following the tradition of classical liberalism, Kant's political philosophy and theory of justice focus on the relation between individual freedom, as the central value of political life, and the state, whose primary normative function is both to restrain and protect individual liberty. In this accessible interpretation of Kant's political philosophy, Allen D. Rosen focuses on the relation among justice, political authority (the state), and individual liberty. He offers interpretations of the ethical bases of Kant's view of justice, of the structure of his taxonomy of duties, and of his understanding of social welfare legislation. Arguing against the grain of much recent scholarly commentary, Rosen asserts that Kant's principles of justice are direct corollaries of the Categorical Imperative and that Kant does not support an absolute or even near-absolute duty of obedience to governments. He also maintains that Kant has principled and important reasons for repudiating a right of revolution and that Kant is not, as he is almost always taken to be, an advocate of the nightwatchman or minimal state. The Kant that emerges from Rosen's pages is an appealing and surprisingly modern philosopher, whose preoccupation with individual freedom still resonates in contemporary political and philosophical debates, and whose attempts to define the proper limits of individual liberty remain relevant even at the end of the twentieth century.
Economic Justice · Epistemology · Political science · Sociology · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics
Kant on International Distributive Justice
Kantian Right and Poverty Relief
Justice and EU Foreign Policy
Does Kant's Rejection of the Right to Resist Make Him a Legal Rigorist? Instantiation and Interpretation in the Rechtslehre
Kant, the State, and Revolution
Cultivating Virtue
Popular Sovereignty or Cosmopolitan Democracy
Pobreza y propiedad. ¿Cara y cruz de la misma moneda? Una lectura desde el republicanismo kantiano
The Kantian Liberal Peace (Revisited)
Metamorphosis or Palingenesis? Political Change in Kant
Kant's Rhetoric of Enlightenment
The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought
States of Emergency in Liberal Democracies
Kantian Ethics and Politics
A Moral Grounding of the Duty to Further Justice in Commercial Life
Rawls, Kant'sDoctrine of Right,and Global Distributive Justice
Kant on Welfare
Modernity, Freedom, and the State
Grounding Positive Duties in Commercial Life
Autonomy, Self-Knowledge, and Liberal Legitimacy
Autonomy and Self-Identity
Black Radical Kantianism
Political Liberty
Kant and Global Distributive Justice
The Self as Narrator
Autonomy, Vulnerability, Recognition, and Justice
Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism
Autonomy and Male Dominance
Kant on Civil Society and Welfare
The Bystander in Commercial Life
Kant on Welfare
Rawls Vs. Nozick Vs. Kant on Domestic Economic Justice
Liberalism, Diversity and Domination
Democratic Transitions and the Progress of Absolutism in Kant's Political Thought
Kant's Political Religion
Kant and Dependency Relations
Citizenship and Property Rights
The European Union and Kant’s idea of cosmopolitan right
Why do states have territorial rights
| Unique citing works | 39 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,34 |
| Citation span | 1997 - 2020 (24) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 28 |