Is Scientific Metaphysics Possible?
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23168521 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mario Bunge (McGill University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1971 |
| Volume | 68 |
| Issue | 17 |
| Pages | 507 |
| Publication date | 1971-09-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-362X • E-ISSN: 1939-8549 |
| Publisher | Philosophy Documentation Center (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2024691 |
| OpenAlex | W190023425 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
Metaphysics is back and doing rather well considering that it was pronounced defunct several times over the past two centuries. It comes in three different species: plain, exact, and scientific. Plain metaphysics ranges from elaborate nonsense through archaic common sense to deep and sophisticated yet outdated good sense. Although it is a rich mine of problems and insights, plain metaphysics is too far removed from contemporary knowledge. On the other hand, exact metaphysics, as exemplified by the so-called calculus of individuals and by some recent theories of possibility and of time, is done with the explicit help of contemporary logical or mathematical tools. It is living proof that metaphysics need not be obscure and on bad terms with logic. All too often, though, exact metaphysics neglects the philosophical tradition or does not care much for science, thus tending to become a futile exercise in applied logic. Scientific metaphysics is more ambitious: it attempts to solve some of the problems left over by plain metaphysics, it tackles new problem, and it tries to be in tune with both formal and factual science.
Analytic philosophy · Contemporary philosophy · Epistemology · Metaphysics · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.08 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1976 - 2022 (47) |
| Highly cited | No |