Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) A. H. Norris , Michelle L. McGowan , Danielle Czarnecki , Danielle Bessett , Hillary J. Gyuras
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) The Ohio State University, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
ANO 2023
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Journal of Health and Social Behavior
ISSN 0022-1465
E-ISSN 2150-6000
EDITORA JSTOR (United States)
DOI 10.1177/00221465231172177
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18

Resumo

This study examines an underexplored source of medical uncertainty: the political context of care. Since 2011, Ohio has passed over 16 abortion-restrictive laws. We know little about how this legislation affects reproductive health care outside of abortion clinics. Drawing on focus groups and interviews with genetic counselors and obstetrician-gynecologists, we examine how abortion legislation impacts their work. We find that interpretation and implementation of legislation is not straightforward and varies by institution and region of the state. An ever-changing legislative landscape combined with uneven implementation of restrictions into policy produces uncertainty in reproductive health care. We also found uncertainty about the legal consequences of abortion in restrictive contexts, with obstetrician-gynecologists reporting greater concerns given their proximity to care provision. We argue that uncertainty can result in stricter interpretations of regulations than necessitated by the law, thereby amplifying the impacts of an already restrictive context for abortion care.

Ferramentas