Galen and the Ontology of Powers
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23168864 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert J Hankinson |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 951-973 |
| Publication date | 2014-09-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Journal for the History of Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0960-8788 • E-ISSN: 1469-3526 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09608788.2014.988118 |
| OpenAlex | W2010999984 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 6 |
What, for Galen, are powers, and how are they to be properly individuated? The notion of a power or capacity (dunamis) does a great deal of work in Galen. As in Aristotle, the concept of a dunamis is tightly linked with that of an energeia, but these are not simply logical abstractions. Rather the natural energeiai are the basic functional activities of the animal body and its parts, and just as health consists in proper functioning, so disease is defined as ‘damage to one of the natural energeiai of the body’, and these activities are damaged when something interferes with its related dunamis. Here I try to make sense of the apparently very different things Galen says regarding dunameis. For example, he says that they do not inhabit our bodies as we do our houses; that is, presumably, they are not substantial or hypostasized; rather they are properties of us. Equally, he is perfectly clear that they are relational items: a power is a power for affecting something determinate in some determinate way. They are also said to be efficient causes. But it is not clear how these different strands fit together.
Epistemology · Natural (archaeology) · Ontology · Physics · Power (physics) · Classical Philosophy and Thought · History · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2019 (3) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |