Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Making Morality Work

Bibliographic Data

ID23171349
AuthorsHolly M Smith (0000-0003-0866-1383, corresponding author)
Year2018
Pages448
Publication date2018-05-24
Open AccessNo
TypeBOOK
VenueMaking Morality Work (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/oso/9780199560080.001.0001
OpenAlexW2804319846
Open LibraryOL30599091M
ISBN9780199560080
LanguageEN
Citations received13

Moral theories can play both a theoretical and a practical role. As theories, they provide accounts of which features make actions right or wrong. In practice, they provide standards by which we guide our choices. Regrettably, limits on human knowledge often prevent people from using traditional moral theories to make decisions. Decision makers labor under false beliefs, or they are ignorant or uncertain about the circumstances and consequences of their possible actions. An agent so hampered cannot successfully use her chosen moral theory as a decision-guide. This book examines three major strategies for addressing this “epistemic problem” in morality. One strategy argues that the epistemic limitations of agents are defects in them but not in the moral theories, which are only required to play the theoretical role. A second strategy holds that the main or sole point of morality is to play the practical role, so that any theory incapable of guiding decisions must be rejected in favor of a more usable theory. The third strategy claims the correct theory can play both the theoretical and practical role through a two-tier structure. The top tier plays the theoretical role, while the lower tier provides a coordinated set of user-friendly decision-guides to provide practical guidance. Agents use the theoretical account indirectly to guide their choices by directly utilizing the supplementary decision-guides. Making Morality Work argues that the first two strategies should be rejected, and develops an innovative version of the third strategy.

Decision theory · Economics · Epistemology · Management science · Microeconomics · Morality · Point (geometry) · Set (abstract data type) · Sociology · USable · Computer Science · Mathematics · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · conduct of life · Ethics

  • Research Ethical Norms, Guidance and the Internet

    Open Access•Håkan Salwén•Science and Engineering Ethics•2021

  • Questions Should Have Answers

    Open Access•Michael Deigan•European Journal of Philosophy•2026

  • Rights

    Open Access•Joseph Bowen•Ratio•2025

  • Non-ideal prescriptions for the morally uncertain

    Open Access•Amelia Hicks•Philosophical Studies•2022

  • What the doctor should do

    Open Access•Davide Fassio•Philosophical Studies•2022

  • A Bit Less Clueless

    Open Access•Joe Slater•The Journal of Ethics•2026

  • Moral Decision Guides

    Open Access•Holly Smith, Holly M Smith•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2022

  • Ethics and the Question of What to Do

    Open Access•Olle Risberg•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2023

  • Rational Moral Ignorance

    Open Access•Zach Barnett•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2020

  • Formal epistemology without demandingness

    Open Access•Tim Smartt•Synthese•2025

  • Conceptualising morally permissible risk imposition without quantified individual risks

    Open Access•Susanne Burri•Synthese•2022

  • Morality, Uncertainty

    Open Access•Chad Lee-Stronach•The Philosophical Quarterly•2021

  • The Moral Evaluation of Repeated Risks

    Open Access•Vishnu Sridharan•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2025

Unique citing works13
Citations per year2.17
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 13

Tools

Open DOILibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae