Is there a good epistemological argument against platonism?
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23172007 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David Liggins (0000-0001-6944-5970, University of Cambridge, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 66 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 135-141 |
| Publication date | 2006-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Analysis (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0003-2638 • E-ISSN: 1467-8284 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/analys/66.2.135 |
| OpenAlex | W4233270768 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
Journal Article Is there a good epistemological argument against platonism? Get access David Liggins David Liggins University of CambridgeCambridge CB3 9DA, [email protected] Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Analysis, Volume 66, Issue 2, April 2006, Pages 135–141, https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/66.2.135 Published: 01 April 2006
Argument (complex analysis) · Epistemology · Platonism · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Philosophy
The epistemological challenge to metanormative realism
On Educational Assessment Theory
Neutrality and Force in Field’s epistemological objection to platonism
Abstract Entities in the Causal Order
Benacerraf, Field, and the agreement of mathematicians
Optimus prime
An integrative design? How liberalised modal empiricism fails the integration challenge
Pretense, Mathematics, and Cognitive Neuroscience
Epistemological Objections to Platonism
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,56 |
| Citation span | 2010 - 2024 (15) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |