Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) THOMAS OLESEN
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Department of Philosophy and History of Ideas, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
ANO 2019
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Latin American Politics and Society
ISSN 1531-426X
E-ISSN 1548-2456
EDITORA Cambridge University Press
DOI 10.1177/0032329219844140
CITAÇÕES 1
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 d2ff502a861d83c09965890ada0a3b77

Resumo

Works on whistleblowing are overwhelmingly found within disciplines such as business ethics, law, and the professions. Despite its undeniable political and social effects, it is surprisingly understudied in political science and sociology. Recent cases such as those of Chelsea Manning, Edward Snowden, Christopher Wylie, and the Panama Papers should prompt political scientists and sociologists to engage systematically with the phenomenon. This article offers a theoretically driven discussion of three complementary questions. (1) What kind of political action is whistleblowing? (2) What are its historical, social, and political roots? (3) How is the practice shaped by digitalization and big data? In relation to the third question, the article argues that digitalization amplifies social complexity and challenges democratic steering. Building on Niklas Luhmann, Ulrich Beck, and Jeffrey Alexander, it lends theoretical weight to the argument that whistleblowers are likely to play an increasingly pronounced political role as digitalization accelerates.

Ferramentas