Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Canon, Anti-Canon, and Judicial Dissent

Bibliographic Data

ID23176239
AuthorsRichard A Primus (corresponding author)
Year1998
Volume48
Issue2
Pages243
Publication date1998-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDuke Law Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0012-7086 • E-ISSN: 1939-9111
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1373107
OpenAlexW1607370195
LanguageEN
Citations received6

Several legal theorists have recently explored the idea that constitutional law has a canon, a set of greatly authoritative texts that above all others shape the nature and development of constitutional law. In a piece published earlier this year in the Harvard Law Review, Jack Balkin and Sanford Levinson enter that discussion and argue that the constitutional canon has heretofore laid too much emphasis on court cases in general and on opinions of the Supreme Court in particular. In the course of their argument, they cite an earlier study of constitutional law casebooks currently in use to show that certain cases are, by consensus, indispensable to a knowledge of constitutional law. In parallel to the function that anthologies of literature perform in fields like English, Balkin and Levinson note, casebooks play a large role in the construction of the constitutional canon. According to the study they cite, ten Supreme Court cases appear in every one of the eleven major casebooks included in the survey. The list of ten is largely intuitive to anyone familiar with constitutional law. No one, I suspect, would be surprised to learn that Marbury v. Madison, McCulloch v. Maryland, and Brown v. Board of Education appear in every major constitutional law casebook now on the market. Each of those cases is the locus classicus of a major doctrine of constitutional law. Indeed, the Court's decisions in nine of the ten cases listed established propositions that continue to shape the law today. Lawyers and courts continue to cite those nine decisions for their legal authority, and many of the cases carry symbolic value as high moments in the exposition of constitutional law.

Aesthetics · Canon · Dissent · Political science · Historical and Linguistic Studies · Law · Philosophy · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity

  • Academic dissent in a post Covid-19 world

    Open Access•Stephen Schweinsberg, David A Fennell et al.•Annals of Tourism Research•2021

  • Legal fictions and the limits of legal language

    Open Access•Karen Petroski•International Journal of Law in…•2013

  • The House that Built Holmes

    Open Access•Brad Snyder•Law and History Review•2012

  • Minority will? A model of influential dissenting opinions

    Open Access•Sam England, Tom S Clark•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2026

  • Constructing the global constitutional canon

    Michaela Hailbronner•University of Toronto Law Journal•2019

  • A Man for All Seasons

    Daniel Frost, Keith E Whittington•Polity•2017

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,43
Citation span2012 - 2026 (15)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae