Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Rawls and Liberalism

Bibliographic Data

ID23177939
AuthorsThomas Nagel (0000-0001-8459-4616, California University of Pennsylvania, corresponding author)
Year2002
Pages62-85
Publication date2002-11-04
Open AccessYes
TypeCHAPTER
VenueThe Cambridge companion to Rawls (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherCambridge University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1017/ccol0521651670.002
OpenAlexW2506523872
ISBN9780521651677
LanguageEN
Citations received13

“Liberalism” means different things to different people. The term is currently used in Europe by the left to castigate the right for blind faith in the value of an unfettered market economy and insufficient attention to the importance of state action in realizing the values of equality and social justice. (Sometimes this usage is marked by the variants “neoliberalism” or “ultraliberalism.”) In the United States, on the other hand, the term is used by the right to castigate the left for unrealistic attachment to the values of social and economic equality and the too ready use of government power to pursue those ends at the cost of individual freedom and initiative. Thus, American Republicans who condemn the Democrats as bleeding-heart liberals are precisely the sort of people who are condemned as heartless liberals by French Socialists. Both of these radically opposed pejorative uses have some basis in the broad tradition of liberalism as a group of political movements and political ideas, sharing certain convictions and disagreeing about others. It is a significant fact about our age that most political argument in the Western world now goes on between different branches of that tradition. Its great historical figures are Locke, Rousseau, Constant, Kant, and Mill, and, in our century, its intellectual representatives have included Dewey, Orwell, Hayek, Aron, Hart, Berlin, and many others. With the recent spread of democracy, liberalism has become politically important in countries throughout the world.

Classical liberalism · Democracy · Economic liberalism · Law and economics · Liberalism · Pejorative · Political science · Politics · Social contract · Sociology · State (computer science) · Law · Political Philosophy and Ethics

  • How “political” is Quong’s political liberalism

    Open Access•Enrico Zoffoli•Filozofija i drustvo•2014

  • Justificação pública

    Open Access•Denis Coitinho Silveira, Denis Coitinho•Kriterion Revista de Filosofia•2011

  • Liberalismo, justiça social e responsabilidade individual

    Open Access•Álvaro De Vita•Dados•2011

  • Against Public Reason

    Open Access•Dan Enoch•SSRN Electronic Journal•2015

  • Institutions versus lifestyle

    Stijn Neuteleer, Stijn Neuteleers•Environmental Politics•2010

  • Rawls's A Theory of Justice

    Jon Mandle•Rawls's 'a Theory of Justice'•2009

  • John Rawls

    Open Access•William A Edmundson•John Rawls•2017

  • Cohen's Critique of Rawls

    Alan Thomas•Mind•2011

  • Rawls on Race/Race in Rawls

    Open Access•C W Mills•The Southern Journal of Philosophy•2009

  • Die Idee des politischen Liberalismus (1992)

    Open Access•Tim Reiß•Rawls-Handbuch•2023

  • Black Rights/White Wrongs

    C W Mills•Black Rights/White Wrongs•2017

  • Justice and innovation – towards principles for creating a fair space for innovation

    Open Access•Rafael Ziegler•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2015

  • Rawlsian Resources for Animal Ethics

    Ruth Abbey•Ethics & the Environment•2007

Citations per year0.68
Citation span2007 - 2023 (17)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubLibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae