How Creative are the Super-Rich?
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23178104 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jason Potts (0000-0003-1468-870X, Queensland University of Technology, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Publication date | 2006-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Agenda - A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1322-1833 • E-ISSN: 1447-4735 |
| Publisher | ANU Press (PUBLISHER • AU) |
| DOI | 10.22459/ag.13.04.2006.04 |
| OpenAlex | W1683239904 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 9 |
This paper seeks to analyse the contribution of the ‘creative industries’ to the ranks of the super-rich. Rich list 2005-6 data for Australia and several other countries, indicate that while the creative industries represent only a small share of aggregate income (about five per cent) and an even smaller share of the largest national and global companies, they are disproportionately represented as generators of extreme personal wealth (about 10 per cent) and even more-so for the young rich (approximately one-third). Young fortunes are the stand-out feature of the creative industries from this perspective, and a tangible sign of their economic significance in both an open economy and an open society. The paper seeks to explain, from the evolutionary economic perspective, what this empirical finding might mean for public policy.
Art · Art History and Market Analysis · Cultural Industries and Urban Development · Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Four models of the creative industries
Nice work if you can get it
Evolutionary Economics and Creative Destruction
The Creative Industries after Cultural Policy
Distribution of Personal Wealth in Britain
Distribution of Personal Wealth in Britain
From cultural to creative industries
The All-Time Australian 200 Rich List
Superwealth in Australia
| Citations per year | 0.22 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2008 - 2018 (11) |
| Highly cited | No |