Universals And Particular Forms In Aristotle’S Metaphysics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23180893 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael Woods (0000-0003-3813-4138, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1991 |
| Pages | 41-56 |
| Publication date | 1991-10-03 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Aristotle and the later tradition (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University PressOxford (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/oso/9780198239659.003.0004 |
| OpenAlex | W4388337310 |
| ISBN | 9780198239659 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
In Form and Universal in Aristotle1 Antony Lloyd wrote: ‘to attribute particular forms to Aristotle has only recently been a familiar notion for most British and American scholars’. Since then, the number of those who have taken the same view as Lloyd has grown.2 This tendency among recent writers on Aristotle has encouraged me to look again at Metaph. Z 13, which has been thought to require the attribution of a belief in particular forms to Aristotle.
Art · Attribution · Epistemology · Literature · Metaphysics · Problem of universals · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.08 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2002 - 2010 (9) |
| Highly cited | No |