Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Reframing Populist Resentments in the Tea Party Movement

Bibliographic Data

ID23181402
AuthorsChip Berlet (0000-0002-4997-9614, corresponding author)
Year2012
Pages47-66
Publication date2012-08-14
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeCHAPTER
VenueSteep (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherUniversity of California Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1525/california/9780520274228.003.0003
OpenAlexW4238506646
ISBN9780520274228
LanguageEN
Citations received15

This chapter argues that Tea Party advances its agenda using the historic rhetoric, tropes, and frames of right-wing populism, especially the narrative called “producerism.” In right-wing producerist movements, activists tend to perceive their political adversaries through the lens of fear-based dualism (self versus other; us versus them) and demonization of the “other.” They claim their opponents threaten the very existence of the nation. In the Tea Party movement, these views are intertwined with long-standing right-wing conspiracy theories about liberal betrayal. In an effort to mobilize its members, the Tea Party movement largely has adopted fear-based frames and narratives in which liberal and left ideological opponents are demonized and scapegoated as consciously or unconsciously destroying the America of liberty and freedom.

Aesthetics · Art · Cognitive reframing · Demonization · Ideology · Law and economics · Literature · Media studies · Narrative · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Populism · Resentment · Rhetoric · Sociology · Tea party · Chinese history and philosophy · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Narcissistic Rage and Neoliberal Reproduction

    Earl Gammon•Global Society•2017

  • From boots on the ground to followers in the sky

    Open Access•ANNE MØRK•American Studies in Scandinavia•2020

  • Economic populism and sovereigntism

    Gilles Ivaldi, Oscar Mazzoleni•European Politics and Society•2019

  • No Permanent Friends, No Permanent Enemies

    Open Access•Karen Trapenberg Frick•Journal of Planning Education and…•2018

  • Resentment and Coping With the Democratic Dilemma

    Open Access•Karen Celis, Louise Knops et al.•Politics and Governance•2021

  • Theorizing the radical right

    Open Access•John Kincaid•Sociology Compass•2017

  • Hyperbole historique

    Lucie Genay•Revue française d’études…•2022

  • Building a Coalition of Makers

    Open Access•Johanna Ilene Römer•Du Bois Review Social Science…•2024

  • The politics of sustainable development opposition

    Open Access•Karen Trapenberg Frick, David Weinzimmer et al.•Urban Studies•2015

  • Is the Tea Party Libertarian, Authoritarian, or Something Else

    Open Access•Jonathan Havercroft, Justin Murphy•Social Science Quarterly•2018

  • Populism as a Concept and the Challenge of U.S. History

    Open Access•Charles Postel•IdeAs•2019

  • Barack Obama and the Calculus of Presidential Ambiguity

    Open Access•Michael Foley•Political Studies Review•2013

  • Individual Responsibility, Culture, or State Organized Enslavement? How Tea Party Activists Frame Racial Inequality

    Open Access•Kristin Haltinner•Sociological Perspectives•2016

  • The Nature and Nuance of Climate Change Skepticism in the United States

    Open Access•Kristin Haltinner, Dilshani Sarathchandra•Rural Sociology•2021

  • Right-Wing Ideologies and Ideological Diversity in the Tea Party

    Kristin Haltinner•Sociological Quarterly•2018

Unique citing works15
Citations per year1.15
Citation span2013 - 2024 (12)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 13

Tools

Open DOILibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae