Conditions for a neoliberal turn
The cases of Hungary and Slovenia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23181799 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Miroslav Stanojević (0000-0002-5784-1607, Univerza v Ljubljani, Slovenia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 97-112 |
| Publication date | 2014-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Journal of Industrial Relations (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0959-6801 • E-ISSN: 1461-7129 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0959680113515609 |
| OpenAlex | W2331190591 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 15 |
Even before the end of the one-party system, both Hungary and Slovenia experienced systematic internal market reforms. After the abrupt political transition there has been a complete shift to a market economy. In Hungary, this had clear features of a neoliberal transformation; but in Slovenia an alternative path was taken, involving neo-corporatism with its Keynesian welfare correlates. Yet during the last decade, a new wave of radical neoliberal change has occurred in both countries. In this article, I compare the transformations in both countries, in order to identify the conditions underlying the neoliberal turn in each.
Corporatism · Economic system · Economics · Market economy · Neoliberalism (international relations) · Order (exchange) · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Welfare · Welfare state · Welfare system · Social Policy and Reform Studies
Slovenia
Work after Globalization
Changing Dominant Practice
Social Failures of EU Enlargement
Capitalist Diversity on Europe's Periphery
Dictatorship over Needs
Capitalist Diversity and Change
The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism
The Future of European Welfare
Neoliberalism, embedded neoliberalism and neocorporatism
Brief History of Neoliberalism
Hungary’s Illiberal Turn
Liberal Corporatism and Party Government
Emerging Varieties of Capitalism in Transition Countries
| Citations per year | 0.7 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2016 - 2025 (10) |
| Highly cited | No |