Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Twenty-Five On

Bibliographic Data

ID23182829
AuthorsDavid Gauthier (0000-0002-0964-5548, corresponding author)
Year2013
Volume123
Issue4
Pages601-624
Publication date2013-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEthics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0014-1704 • E-ISSN: 1539-297X
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1086/670246
OpenAlexW2074915058
LanguageEN
Citations received27
References cited7

This article updates Morals by Agreement. It distinguishes two opposed conceptions of deliberative rationality—maximization and Pareto-optimization. It defends the latter. The constrained maximizers of Morals by Agreement are replaced by rational cooperators. They do not bargain but reach agreement on the principle of maximin proportionate gain, which is a relabeling of maximin relative benefit. The contractarian test, of the acceptability of social arrangements and norms, is introduced, and the Lockean proviso assumes an enhanced role as a cornerstone of rational cooperation. But questions about the force and rationale of the proviso remain.

Cornerstone · Economics · Epistemology · Law and economics · Mathematical economics · Maximization · Microeconomics · Minimax · Pareto principle · Positive economics · Rationality · Welfare economics · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics

  • Social Choice and Public Reason

    Cyril Hédoin•Social Choice and Public Reason•2026

  • Liberalism and nationalism

    Open Access•Paul Kelly•Cambridge Companion to Liberalism•2015

  • Naturalism and Moral Conventionalism

    Cyril Hédoin•Social Choice and Public Reason•2026

  • Feminist critiques of liberalism

    Open Access•Linda M G Zerilli•Cambridge Companion to Liberalism•2015

  • Contractarianism

    Open Access•Michael Moehler•Contractarianism•2020

  • Replies to Gaus, Van Schoelandt and Cooper

    Open Access•Michael Moehler•Analysis•2019

  • The conservative critique of liberalism

    Open Access•John Skorupski•Cambridge Companion to Liberalism•2015

  • Public reason liberalism

    Open Access•Gerald Gaus, Gerald F Gaus•Cambridge Companion to Liberalism•2015

  • The Cambridge Companion to Liberalism

    Open Access•Steven A Wall, Richard Arneson et al.•Cambridge Companion to Liberalism•2015

  • Rationality, uncertainty, and unanimity

    Open Access•Alexander Schaefer•Economics and Philosophy•2021

  • An intersubjective model of agency for game theory

    Open Access•Vanessa Brown•Economics and Philosophy•2020

  • Berge equilibrium, altruism and social welfare

    Open Access•Hans Haller•Social Choice and Welfare•2024

  • Rational Coordination Without Beliefs

    Open Access•Camilla Colombo, Francesco Guala•Erkenntnis•2023

  • Is mutual advantage a general theory of justice? More domain worries

    Open Access•Gerald Gaus•Philosophical Studies•2021

  • Guard against temptation

    Open Access•Niv Gold•Noûs•2022

  • Contractarianism

    Open Access•Michael Moehler•OEconomia•2023

  • The Gauthier Contract

    Open Access•Jeremy Neill•Res Publica. Revista de Historia…•2015

  • Self-organizing moral systems

    Open Access•Gerald Gaus•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2017

  • Seeming incomparability and rational choice

    Open Access•Leo Yan•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2022

  • Orthodox rational choice contractarianism

    Open Access•Michael Moehler•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2015

  • A game theory perspective on environmental assessment

    Open Access•Alex Bond, Jenny Pope et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2016

  • Rationality in games and institutions

    Open Access•Philippe Van Basshuysen•Synthese•2021

  • Figuring Out How to Proceed with Evaluation After Figuring Out What Matters

    Open Access•Chrisoula Andreou•Dialogue•2016

  • Gauthier, Equilibrium, and the Emergence of Morality

    Open Access•BRETT MULLINS•Dialogue•2016

  • Social Contract

    Open Access•Jan Narveson•Dialogue•2016

  • Agreeing to Disagree

    James Thrasher, John Thrasher•The Journal of Politics•2020

  • Why Habermas needs distributive equity principles

    Open Access•John Davenport•Constellations•2019

  • Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem

    Judith Jarvis Thomson, Sherwood J B Sugden•The Monist•1976

  • Non-Cooperative Games

    John F Nash, John Nash•Annals of Mathematics•1951

  • The Bargaining Problem

    John F Nash•Econometrica•1950

  • A Theory of Justice

    John Rawls•Theory of Justice•1971

  • The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of the Double Effect

    Philippa Foot•Virtues and vices and other…•2002

  • The Right to Exploit

    Gijs van Donselaar•Benefit of Another's Pains•2009

  • Political Contractarianism

    Open Access•David Gauthier•Journal of Political Philosophy•1997

Unique citing works27
Citations per year2,45
Citation span2015 - 2026 (12)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 26

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae