Semantic Profiles of Five Russian Prefixes

Po- , s- , za- , na- , pro

Bibliographic Data

ID23183239
AuthorsLaura A Janda (0000-0001-5047-1909, National Research University Higher School of Economics), Olga Lyashevskaya (0000-0001-8374-423X, National Research University Higher School of Economics)
Year2013
Volume21
Issue2
Pages211-258
Publication date2013-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Slavic Linguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1068-2090 • E-ISSN: 1543-0391
PublisherProject MUSE (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1353/jsl.2013.0012
OpenAlexW2070987460
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited16

We test the hypothesis that Russian verbal prefixes express meaning even when they are used to create a “purely aspectual pair” ( čistovidovaja para ). This is contrary to traditional assumptions that prefixes in this function are semantically “empty.” We analyze the semantic tags independently established in the Russian National Corpus ( www.ruscorpora.ru ) for 382 perfective partner verbs with five of the most common verbal prefixes in Russian: po -, s -, za -, na -, and pro -. Statistical tests show that the relationship between prefixes and semantic tags is significant and robust, and further identify which relationships constitute attractions, repulsions, and neutral relationships. It is possible to specify a unique meaning for each prefix in terms of the semantic tags it attracts or repulses. A detailed analysis of all the verbs in the study shows that the meanings of the prefixed perfective partners yield consistent patterns. Even verbs in repulsed semantic classes are consistent with these patterns. The meaning patterns of verbs with “purely aspectual” prefixes can be compared with the meanings of the prefixes as established on the basis of previous scholarship, which was primarily focused on the meanings of prefixes in their “non-empty” uses. This comparison shows that the verb meanings that appear with “purely perfectivizing” prefixes are the same as those found for “non-empty” uses of prefixes. We conclude that verbs select the prefix that is most compatible with their meanings when forming “purely aspectual” perfective partners, confirming our hypothesis.

Humanities · Linguistics · Political science · Prefix · History · Lexicography and Language Studies · Linguistics and Cultural Studies · Linguistics and language evolution · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access