Response
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23184172 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael Walzer (0000-0002-2036-9388, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1995 |
| Pages | 281-298 |
| Publication date | 1995-04-06 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Pluralism, Justice, and Equality (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University PressOxford (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/0198280084.003.0013 |
| OpenAlex | W4206500402 |
| ISBN | 9780198280088 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 15 |
Responding to the critical assessments of his Spheres of Justice, Michael Walzer rethinks the central aspects of the notion of complex equality. He addresses the following issues: the meaning and possibility of complex equality; the centrality of democratic citizenship; the danger of complex inequality; the injustice of current international distributions; the role of ordinary morality in distributive justice; the importance of efficiency; and the need for a historical account of social differentiation and distributive complexity.
Centrality · Citizenship · Democracy · Distributive justice · Distributive property · Economic Justice · Epistemology · Inequality · Injustice · Law and economics · Meaning (existential) · Morality · Political science · Pure mathematics · Sociology · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics
Justice without Borders
Michael Walzer, Spheres of Justice
International Distributive Justice
Global Justice
Global Justice Without End?
Reasonable Impartiality and Priority for Compatriots. A Criticism of Liberal Nationalism’s Main flaws
Culture, Citizenship, and Community
Liberal Nationalism and Cosmopolitan Justice
Capital and distinction or goods and traditions? Toward a post-Bourdieusian cultural theory
Global equality of opportunity
Looking Into the Eyes of Those We Serve
Justice in transport as justice in accessibility
Advancing Justice in Society
Nationalist cosmopolitanism
Quality of Government
| Citations per year | 0.58 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2000 - 2025 (26) |
| Highly cited | No |