The Methodological Irrelevance of Reflective Equilibrium

Bibliographic Data

ID23185196
AuthorsTristram Mcpherson (0000-0001-9190-3835, Virginia Tech, corresponding author)
Year2015
Pages652-674
Publication date2015-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeCHAPTER
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan UK (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1057/9781137344557_27
OpenAlexW2429129275
ISBN9781137344557
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited36

John Rawls’ method of reflective equilibrium is the most influential methodology in contemporary ethics. This chapter argues that this influence is undeserved. Rawls’ method is highly implausible. Worse, it is also incapable of performing the work that motivates the search for a moral methodology in the first place. These are bold charges, and I dedicate the bulk of the chapter to substantiating them (sections 3–5). Several of the objections that I offer have been pressed before. However, when such objections are pressed in isolation from each other, it can seem easy to salvage the spirit (if not the letter) of the method, by judicious adjustment. It is much more difficult to do this once the inadequacies of the method are systematically displayed. I illustrate this point by exploring salient attempts to salvage the spirit of reflective equilibrium by abandoning elements of Rawls’ approach (section 6). I argue that none of these attempts succeed. I conclude that appeal to the method of reflective equilibrium is not a helpful means of addressing pressing methodological questions in ethics. In a slogan, reflective equilibrium is methodologically irrelevant.

Appeal · Economics · Epistemology · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Reflective equilibrium · Salient · Slogan · Ethics in medical practice · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics

Tools

Open DOILibgenOpen Access