Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Divining Differences

Bibliographic Data

ID23196834
AuthorsEllen T Armour (0000-0002-9734-8083, corresponding author)
Year2020
Pages29-40
Publication date2020-04-19
Open AccessNo
TypeCHAPTER
VenueReligion in French Feminist Thought (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.4324/9781315010823-4
OpenAlexW3120189860
ISBN9781315010823
LanguageEN
Citations received1

The logic of sameness that encloses Irigaray’s woman divine and the women she would divinise too closely binds them to the ‘good old God’ and the men he divinises. Taking air as a sensible transcendental as one means of refiguring the religious offers an alternative to the logic of traditional theism that ‘Divine Women’ seems to repeat. Commentators see the sensible transcendental as a counterpart to the idea of divinising women, as another ideal-yet-to-be-imagined that women can project for the sake of their own becoming and as a support for genuine relationships. Irigaray deploys this term in the service of the concerns that the myths and fables mentioned in ‘Divine Women’ bring to mind. The logic of sameness that encloses Irigaray’s woman divine and the women she would divinise too closely binds them to the ‘good old God’ and the men he divinises.

Medieval Philosophy and Theology · Psychology · Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment · Simone de Beauvoir and Sartre

  • The Mysticism of Ordinary Life

    Andrew Prevot•Mysticism of Ordinary Life•2023

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae