Divine Command Theory in Early Franciscan Thought
A Response to the Autonomy Objection
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23196901 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lydia Schumacher (0000-0001-5092-6512, University of Edinburgh, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 461-476 |
| Publication date | 2016-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Studies in Christian Ethics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0953-9468 • E-ISSN: 1745-5235 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0953946816658722 |
| OpenAlex | W2500544147 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
In recent years, many scholars have bemoaned the gradual demise of traditional virtue ethics, and its eventual replacement in the later Middle Ages by divine command theory. Where virtue ethics nurtures a capacity for spontaneous moral judgement, this theory turns on adherence to ordained duties and laws. Thus, virtue ethicists among others have tended to object to the theory on the grounds that it undermines the role of the moral agent in moral adjudication. In this article, by contrast, I will argue that there is a way of construing divine command theory, which is not susceptible to this critique. To this end, I will turn to the work of first-generation Franciscan scholars, who affirmed the necessity of human understanding of divine commands and the complete freedom of the will to observe them.
Adjudication · Autonomy · Demise · Epistemology · Judgement · Normative ethics · Political science · Virtue · Virtue ethics · Historical Economic and Legal Thought · Law · Medieval Philosophy and Theology · Philosophy · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
| Citations per year | 0.14 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2019 - 2019 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |