Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Three Ways of Talking about Value

Bibliographic Data

ID23200968
AuthorsDavid Graeber (corresponding author)
Year2001
Pages1-22
Publication date2001-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeCHAPTER
VenueToward an Anthropological Theory of Value (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan US (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1057/9780312299064_1
OpenAlexW2493965472
ISBN9780312299064
LanguageEN

If one reads a lot of anthropology, it is hard to escape the impression that theories of value are all the rage of late. One certainly sees references to "value" and "theories of value" all the time—usually thrown out in such a way as to suggest there is a vast and probably very complicated literature lying behind them.1 If one tries to track this literature down, however, one quickly runs into problems. In fact it is extremely difficult to find a systematic "theory of value" anywhere in the recent literature; and it usually turns out to be very difficult to figure out what body of theory, if any, that any particular author who uses the term "value" is drawing on. Sometimes, one suspects it is this very ambiguity that makes the term so attractive.KeywordsColor TermGrand TheoryAnthropological TheoryGift EconomyEconomic AnthropologyThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Ambiguity · Epistemology · Linguistics · Term (time) · Value (mathematics) · Computer Science · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOILibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae