Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Redd+ Crossroads Post Paris

Politics, Lessons and Interplays

Bibliographic Data

ID23201113
AuthorsEsteve Corbera (0000-0001-7970-4411, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona, corresponding author), Heike Schroeder (0000-0003-2342-2030, University of East Anglia)
Year2017
Volume8
Issue12
Pages508
Publication date2017-12-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueForests (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1999-4907 • E-ISSN: 1999-4907
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/f8120508
OpenAlexW2778579622
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited41

This article introduces the special issue “REDD+ crossroads post Paris: politics, lessons and interplays”. The contributions to the special issue demonstrate, first, that REDD+ design in the studied countries has generally lacked social legitimacy and sidelined key actors that have an important role in shaping land-use sector dynamics. Second, they show that REDD+ early actions have tended to oversimplify local realities and have been misaligned with other policy goals and local needs. Third, REDD+ efforts have remained constrained to the forestry or climate mitigation policy sectors and have thus suffered from a lack of harmonization across local, national and international concerns, specifically of contradictory policy. As REDD+ moves from its preparedness to its implementation phase, more research efforts should be aimed at analysing the power relations that underpin and determine the design and implementation of REDD+ policies and actions, the potential for and limits to the vertical and horizontal harmonization of land-use policies and management, and the processes of resistance to or accommodation of REDD+ practices on the ground. In doing so, we advocate for multi-and transdisciplinary research that does not take for granted the benefits of REDD+ and which critically scrutinizes the multiple goals of this ambitious international policy framework, and where it sits within the broader Paris Agreement implementation agenda.

Business · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Harmonization · Legitimacy · Political science · Politics · Preparedness · Resistance (ecology) · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Forest Management and Policy · French Urban and Social Studies · Public Administration

  • Oaxaca and global forest governance

    Open Access•Kyle Haines•Journal of Political Ecology•2021

  • Accelerating subnational deforestation and forest degradation reduction efforts (Redd+)

    Open Access•Trong Hoan, Meine Van Noordwijk•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2023

  • Ecosystem services and nature’s contribution to people

    Open Access•Erle C Ellis, Unai Pascual et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2019

  • Negative emissions and the long history of carbon removal

    Open Access•Wim Carton, Adeniyi Asiyanbi et al.•Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews…•2020

  • Conflicting securities

    Open Access•Corinne Lamain•Globalizations•2022

  • Climate change mitigation on tropical peatlands

    Open Access•Jennifer Merten, Jonas Østergaard Nielsen et al.•Global Environmental Change•2021

  • Policy learning in Redd+ Donor Countries

    Open Access•Heike Schroeder, Monica Di Gregorio et al.•Global Environmental Change•2020

  • Bridging knowledge divides

    Open Access•Heike Schroeder, Nidia Catherine González•Forest Policy and Economics•2019

  • Rendering Local

    Open Access•Wim Carton•Annals of the American…•2020

  • Whose security? Politics, risks and alternatives for climate security practices in agrarian-environmental perspectives

    Open Access•Corinne Lamain•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2024

  • The Economics of Climate Change

    Open Access•Nicholas Stern, Paul Warde•Economics of Climate Change•2007

  • Redd+ as Result‐based Aid

    Open Access•Arild Angelsen•Review of Development Economics•2017

  • Comparing methods for assessing the effectiveness of subnational Redd+ initiatives

    Open Access•Astrid Bos, Astrid B Bos et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2017

  • Will Redd+ work? The need for interdisciplinary research to address key challenges

    Open Access•I J Visseren-Hamakers, Aarti Gupta et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2012

  • Envisioning Redd + in a post‐Paris era

    Open Access•Esther Turnhout, Aarti Gupta et al.•Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews…•2016

  • Legitimacy in Redd+ governance in Indonesia

    Open Access•Adelaide Glover, Heike Schroeder•International Environmental…•2017

  • Legitimacy of local Redd+ processes. A comparative analysis of pilot projects in Brazil and Tanzania

    Open Access•Mary Nantongo, Mary Gorret Nantongo•Environmental Science & Policy•2017

  • Incentivizing Redd

    Open Access•Tessa Dunlop, Esteve Corbera•Environmental Science & Policy•2016

  • Governing and implementing Redd

    Open Access•Esteve Corbera, Heike Schroeder•Environmental Science & Policy•2010

  • What does it take to institute Redd +? An analysis of the Kilosa Redd + pilot, Tanzania

    Open Access•Arild Vatn, G C Kajembe et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2017

  • Framing national Redd+ benefits, monitoring, governance and finance

    Open Access•Marjanneke J Vijge, Maria Brockhaus et al.•Global Environmental Change•2016

  • Can Redd+ social safeguards reach the ‘right’ people? Lessons from Madagascar

    Open Access•Mahesh Poudyal, Bruno Ramamonjisoa et al.•Global Environmental Change•2016

  • Promising Change, Delivering Continuity

    Open Access•Jens Friis Lund, Eliezeri Sungusia et al.•World Development•2016

  • Sowing the seeds of sustainable rural livelihoods? An assessment of Participatory Forest Management through Redd+ in Tanzania

    Open Access•Esteve Corbera, Adrian Martins et al.•Land Use Policy•2020

  • Redd+ for Red Books? Negotiating rights to land and livelihoods through carbon governance in the Central Highlands of Vietnam

    Open Access•Phuc Xuan To, Phuc To et al.•Geoforum•2017

  • Beyond Carbon

    Open Access•Heike Schroeder, Constance L Mcdermott et al.•Conservation Ecology•2014

Unique citing works10
Citations per year1,43
Citation span2019 - 2024 (6)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae