Redd+ Crossroads Post Paris
Politics, Lessons and Interplays
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23201113 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Esteve Corbera (0000-0001-7970-4411, Universitat Autonòma de Barcelona, corresponding author), Heike Schroeder (0000-0003-2342-2030, University of East Anglia) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | 508 |
| Publication date | 2017-12-20 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Forests (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1999-4907 • E-ISSN: 1999-4907 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/f8120508 |
| OpenAlex | W2778579622 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 41 |
This article introduces the special issue “REDD+ crossroads post Paris: politics, lessons and interplays”. The contributions to the special issue demonstrate, first, that REDD+ design in the studied countries has generally lacked social legitimacy and sidelined key actors that have an important role in shaping land-use sector dynamics. Second, they show that REDD+ early actions have tended to oversimplify local realities and have been misaligned with other policy goals and local needs. Third, REDD+ efforts have remained constrained to the forestry or climate mitigation policy sectors and have thus suffered from a lack of harmonization across local, national and international concerns, specifically of contradictory policy. As REDD+ moves from its preparedness to its implementation phase, more research efforts should be aimed at analysing the power relations that underpin and determine the design and implementation of REDD+ policies and actions, the potential for and limits to the vertical and horizontal harmonization of land-use policies and management, and the processes of resistance to or accommodation of REDD+ practices on the ground. In doing so, we advocate for multi-and transdisciplinary research that does not take for granted the benefits of REDD+ and which critically scrutinizes the multiple goals of this ambitious international policy framework, and where it sits within the broader Paris Agreement implementation agenda.
Business · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Harmonization · Legitimacy · Political science · Politics · Preparedness · Resistance (ecology) · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Forest Management and Policy · French Urban and Social Studies · Public Administration
Oaxaca and global forest governance
Accelerating subnational deforestation and forest degradation reduction efforts (Redd+)
Ecosystem services and nature’s contribution to people
Negative emissions and the long history of carbon removal
Conflicting securities
Climate change mitigation on tropical peatlands
Policy learning in Redd+ Donor Countries
Bridging knowledge divides
Rendering Local
Whose security? Politics, risks and alternatives for climate security practices in agrarian-environmental perspectives
The Economics of Climate Change
Redd+ as Result‐based Aid
Comparing methods for assessing the effectiveness of subnational Redd+ initiatives
Will Redd+ work? The need for interdisciplinary research to address key challenges
Envisioning Redd + in a post‐Paris era
Legitimacy in Redd+ governance in Indonesia
Legitimacy of local Redd+ processes. A comparative analysis of pilot projects in Brazil and Tanzania
Incentivizing Redd
Governing and implementing Redd
What does it take to institute Redd +? An analysis of the Kilosa Redd + pilot, Tanzania
Framing national Redd+ benefits, monitoring, governance and finance
Can Redd+ social safeguards reach the ‘right’ people? Lessons from Madagascar
Promising Change, Delivering Continuity
Sowing the seeds of sustainable rural livelihoods? An assessment of Participatory Forest Management through Redd+ in Tanzania
Redd+ for Red Books? Negotiating rights to land and livelihoods through carbon governance in the Central Highlands of Vietnam
Beyond Carbon
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,43 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2024 (6) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |