Lust and Chastity
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23201807 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Colleen Mccluskey (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Pages | 114-135 |
| Publication date | 2014-02-27 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Virtues and Their Vices (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199645541.003.0006 |
| OpenAlex | W2495552378 |
| ISBN | 9780199645541 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
Although there are notable exceptions, a significant part of the current secular literature argues that lust is the virtue and chastity the vice. This is in contrast with the historical tradition that regards lust as a vice and chastity as a virtue. This chapter examines representative arguments for each perspective, comparing Aquinas' account with the more recent treatment of Simon Blackburn. Although the traditional view is unduly narrow, the current view is too broad insofar as it fails to acknowledge the role of friendship in the pursuit of sexual pleasure. Thus, to characterize lust as a virtue and chastity as a vice is premature. As long as one can distinguish between virtuous and unvirtuous sexual activity, lust will be a vice and chastity a virtue
Art · Epistemology · Friendship · Human sexuality · Lust · Perspective (graphical) · Pleasure · Psychoanalysis · Sexual desire · Sociology · Virtue · Gender Studies · Neuroscience · Philosophy · Psychology · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity · Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment · Social Psychology
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,2 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |