Three Concepts of Natural Human Rights
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23203809 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Julian Rivers (University of Bristol, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 182-191 |
| Publication date | 2010-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Studies in Christian Ethics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0953-9468 • E-ISSN: 1745-5235 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0953946809359470 |
| OpenAlex | W2137792605 |
| Language | EN |
This article argues that Wolterstorff’s concept of rights is ambiguous between the interest and will theories. It provides possible reconstructions and points towards a more suitable third concept theologically grounded in an account of humans as constituted relationally, juridically and eternally.
Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Human rights · Law and economics · Natural (archaeology) · Political science · Sociology · History · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Political Theology and Sovereignty
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |