Philosophical Anthropology
An Attempt at a Systematics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23204880 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Павел Гуревич (0000-0003-2968-9393, Russian Academy of Sciences, corresponding author), P S Gurevich (Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences) |
| Year | 2000 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 19-34 |
| Publication date | 2000-12-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Russian Studies in Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1061-1967 • E-ISSN: 1558-0431 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.2753/rsp1061-1967390319 |
| OpenAlex | W2332848837 |
| Language | EN |
The concept of philosophical anthropology is polysemous. These words carry the most diverse and sometimes mutually incompatible nuances of metaphysical thought. It is difficult to judge what criterion would enable us to draw the necessary demarcations. For example, the early writings of the French moralists, in which they discussed human nature, are considered to belong to philosophical anthropology. However, few would classify Arthur Schopenhauer's Aphorisms of Everyday Wisdom [Aphorismen zur Lebensweisheit] as metaphysical literature, although they contain a typology of human needs.1
Epistemology · Metaphysics · Philosophical anthropology · Sociology · Typology · Anthropology · Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel · Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy · Philosophy · Philosophy and Historical Thought
| Highly cited | No |
|---|