Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Is Temperance Ever Properly Painful?

Bibliographic Data

ID23205702
AuthorsDamian G Konkoly (corresponding author)
Year1998
Pages168-176
Publication date1998-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeCHAPTER
VenueThe Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherPhilosophy Documentation Center (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.5840/wcp20-paideia1998358
OpenAlexW2985299903
LanguageEN

Aristotle argues that temperance is the mean concerned with pleasure and pain (NE 1107b5-9 and 1117b25-27). Most commentators focus on the moderation of pleasures and hardly discuss how this virtue relates to pain. In what follows, I consider the place of pain in Aristotle’s discussion of temperance and resolve contradictory interpretations by turning to the following question: is temperance ever properly painful? In part one, I examine the textual evidence and conclude that Aristotle would answer no to our question. The temperate person does not feel pain at the absence of appropriately desired objects. In parts two and three, I reconstruct some reasons why Aristotle would hold such a view based. My discussion here is based upon Aristotle’s discussion of continence and the unity of the virtues.

Aesthetics · Epistemology · Focus (optics) · Moderation · Pain and pleasure · Pleasure · Psychotherapist · Virtue · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

Highly citedNo
Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae