Democratic Transition in the Muslim World
A Global Perspective
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23207818 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alfred C Stepan |
| Editors | Alfred Stepan |
| Year | 2018 |
| Publication date | 2018-12-31 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | Democratic Transition in the Muslim World (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Columbia University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.7312/step18430 |
| OpenAlex | W3200474560 |
| Open Library | OL35821794M |
| ISBN | 9780231545419 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
Contributors to this book are particularly interested in expanding our understanding of what helps, or hurts, successful democratic transition attempts in countries with large Muslim populations. Crafting pro-democratic coalitions among secularists and Islamists presents a special obstacle that must be addressed by theorists and practitioners. The argument throughout the book is that such coalitions will not happen if potentially democratic secularists are part of what Al Stepan terms the authoritarian regime's "constituency of coercion" because they (the secularists) are afraid that free elections will be won by Islamists who threaten them even more than the existing secular authoritarian regime. Tunisia allows us to do analysis on this topic by comparing two "least similar" recent case outcomes: democratic success in Tunisia and democratic failure in Egypt. Tunisia also allows us to do an analysis of four "most similar" case outcomes by comparing the successful democratic transitions in Tunisia, Indonesia, Senegal, and the country with the second or third largest Muslim population in the world, India. Did these countries face some common challenges concerning democratization? Did all four of these successful cases in fact use some common policies that while democratic, had not normally been used in transitions in countries without significant numbers of Muslims? If so, did these policies help the transitions in Tunisia, Indonesia, Senegal and India? If they did, we should incorporate them in some way into our comparative theories about successful democratic transitions
Archaeology · Context (archaeology) · Democracy · Democratization · Development economics · Economics · Geography · Ideology · Islam · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · State (computer science) · Transition (genetics) · Education and Islamic Studies · Global History, Politics, and Ideology · Islamic Finance and Banking Studies · Islamic Studies and History · Law · Islam and politics · Islamic countries · politics and government
Challenging the Narrative
Indonesia in 2018
Unlikely Feminist Coalitions
How can we Agree on Anything in This Environment? Tunisian Media, Transition and Elite Compromises
Budget politics and democratization in Tunisia
Ennahdha et les salafistes
Tunisia’s democratisation process
Acceptance in principle, contestation in practice
Elite polarization and democratic backsliding in Tunisia
Beyond elections
From Victim to Hangman? Ennahda, Salafism and the Tunisian Transition
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1.57 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2024 (6) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |