Understanding disasters

Managing and accommodating different worldviews in humanitarian response

Bibliographic Data

ID23209487
AuthorsMatthew Clarke (0000-0002-8750-4521, Deakin University, corresponding author), Brett W Parris, Brett Parris (0000-0002-2533-3958, Deakin University)
Year2019
Volume4
Issue1
Publication date2019-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of International Humanitarian Action (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2364-3412 • E-ISSN: 2364-3404
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1186/s41018-019-0066-7
OpenAlexW2991465288
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited40

Over the past decade, humanitarian events affected on average 120 million people annually. Whilst many of these events are human-induced, a large number of the 400 or so complex humanitarian emergencies that require international response each year are natural. Such events result in loss of life, injure and maim survivors, destroy infrastructure and give rise to psycho-social trauma. Aid agencies working alongside affected communities must address all these consequences as part of their responses. What is also required though is an appreciation that worldviews will inform how affected communities both understand the cause of the event, their role in the event and how they will subsequently participate in rebuilding or reconstruction programs. Disasters can be affected by religious beliefs. With more than 85% of the global population self-professing religious belief, these worldviews are often shaped in whole or in part by sacred texts, religious teachings and sectarian practices. In this regard, it is not uncommon for those affected by disasters (particularly natural disasters) to genuinely describe these events as ‘acts of God’. Effective responses require the local context to be central in assessing needs and determining capacities. This must include an understanding of and authentic engagement with religious beliefs and how this may affect how the humanitarian event interacts with these beliefs. There is though little evidence as to how professional humanitarian workers accommodate the religious beliefs of local populations in their planning, implementation and evaluation of humanitarian responses. This paper draws on the experiences of humanitarian workers based in the USA and Australia from both faith-based and secular international non-governmental organizations to consider both how these workers themselves accommodate the religious views of affected communities in their responses and also their experience as to how such views affect the effectiveness of responses. This paper will consider why aid agencies must incorporate (and appreciate) different worldviews around disasters in order to more effectively respond to the needs of communities affected by humanitarian events. It will also identify difficulties and opportunities experienced by individual humanitarian practitioners as well as agencies when working in such environments.

Context (archaeology) · Environmental ethics · Geography · Humanitarian aid · Humanitarian crisis · Natural disaster · Political science · Population · Public relations · Refugee · Sociology · History · Homelessness and Social Issues · Law · Religion, Society, and Development · Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology