Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Pilots as Projects

Dados Bibliográficos

ID23212753
AutoresSimon Bailey (0000-0001-9142-2791), Damian Hodgson (0000-0002-9292-5945), Kath Checkland (0000-0002-9961-5317)
Ano2019
Páginas130-148
Data de publicação2019-03-06
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoCHAPTER
PeriódicoThe Projectification of the Public Sector (SOURCE_BOOK)
EditoraRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.4324/9781315098586-8
OpenAlexW2937567839
ISBN9781315098586
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas8
Referências citadas1

The use of policy pilots and other forms of temporary and projectified organisational arrangements has become increasingly widespread over the last two to three decades in public services in the United Kingdom (UK) and elsewhere. Drawing upon a policy ethnography of a pilot programme conducted in the English National Health Service (NHS) we examine the implications of bringing project rationalities to bear upon policy making. Drawing upon the legal-philosophical concept of the “state of exception” (Schmitt, 1985), we show how the process of policy piloting requires a suspension of the ordinary rules in order to enable innovation. However, this has both practical and political consequences. In the immediate term of the pilot, the creation of conditions that are out of the ordinary means that the pilot itself is not necessarily a good test for how things might work in the long run. At the same time, the proliferation of temporary policy projects, each bringing its own suspension of the rules, threatens the integrity of the “ordinary bureaucracy” within which the project is embedded. Piloting obviously represents an attractive and pragmatic approach for politicians and policy makers, while also broadening scope for practitioner and “local” involvement in the generation of policy. At the same time, this project form brings with it a technical rationality and a narrow focus on project goals at the possible expense of core political values such as deliberation and democratic accountability.

Aeronautics · Engineering · Political Theology and Sovereignty

  • Transformation is what you expect, models are what you get

    Open Access•Adeniyi Asiyanbi, Kate Massarella•Journal of Political Ecology•2020

  • Fiscal relations in multilevel climate governance

    Open Access•Ned Crowley, R K Elliott et al.•Environment and Planning C…•2025

  • Reproducing injustice

    Open Access•Kate Massarella, Susannah M Sallu et al.•Global Environmental Change•2020

  • Success” in policy piloting

    Open Access•Kath Checkland, J Hammond et al.•Public Administration•2021

  • Ambiguous workarounds in policy piloting in the NHS

    Open Access•Mhorag Goff, Damian Hodgson et al.•New Technology Work and Employment•2021

  • Local Autonomy in Temporary Organizations

    Open Access•Dalia Mukhtar-Landgren•Administration & Society•2021

  • How are policy pilots managed? Findings from the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme in China

    Open Access•Yunpeng Song, Yanwei Li•Journal of Public Policy•2024

  • The Problem of Success and Failure in Public-private Innovation Partnerships

    Open Access•J Hammond, Simon Bailey et al.•Journal of Social Policy•2022

  • The State of Exception

    Open Access•Giorgio Agamben•Politics, Metaphysics, and Death•2005

Obras citantes distintas8
Citações por ano1,33
Intervalo de citações2020 - 2025 (6)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 7
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae