Crossing the Pali

Crossing the Pali: White Missionary Children, Bicultural Identity, and the Racial Divide In Hawai‘i, 1820–1898 Joy Schulz (bio) If all the seas were one sea, what a great sea that would be! And if all the trees were one tree, what a great tree that would be! . . . And if all the men were one man, what a great man he would be! —English Nursery Rhyme And today I take up my Hawaiian Bible to read a chapter in preference to the English version. It is beautiful Hawaiian. —Sam Wilcox1 The first white missionary children born in the Hawaiian Islands entered a culture engulfed by internal transformation and embattled by foreign pressures. Neither they nor their American missionary parents could have anticipated in 1820 the critical role missionary children would play in this international drama. Not only did the hundreds of missionary children born to American parents in the Hawaiian Islands during the nineteenth century propel the Hawaiian and US governments towards their 1898 conflagration, the children themselves became subjects of the imperial process, their American parents constructing and transmitting a colonial agenda for them, as well as for the indigenous Hawaiian population. Colonial childhood developed into a critical yet contested battlefield upon which US empire was built.2 For the 140 American missionaries sent by the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions (ABCFM) to the Hawaiian Islands between 1819 and 1848, few questions existed as to the proper moral values they were to impart to the kingdom’s “heathen” population. In contrast, from the moment of their birth, missionary children faced enormous obstacles in developing their [End Page 209] own sense of cultural and spiritual identity. Isolated by their parents from the native Hawaiians and oftentimes stationed in remote regions of the islands, missionary children were brought up to adhere to the strict Calvinist messages their parents taught them. These ideologies of racial separation and religious superiority, along with a reverence for American religious institutions and republican political systems, were reinforced at Punahou School, the Honolulu boarding school established by the missionaries for their children in 1841. Mixed-race and indigenous Hawaiian children would not be invited to attend the school until the mid-1850s, by which time the children of American missionaries in the islands numbered over two-hundred and fifty.3 Upon entering adulthood, many missionary children chose to stay in the islands, taking advantage of newly opened feudal lands and planting themselves firmly at the head of numerous influential enterprises, from sugar plantations and newspaper publications to public education and government service. Even when sent to the United States to complete their collegiate educations, missionary children “almost without an exception,” in the words of one missionary son, planned to return to the islands. By 1887 no less than nine of the forty-nine members of the legislature were missionary sons. More significantly, in 1893, many of these missionary children participated in the overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy. One missionary son—Sanford Ballard Dole—led the revolution and served as the Hawaiian Republic’s first president and, after US annexation, Hawaii’s first territorial governor.4 The first American missionaries to Hawai‘i did not seek government positions or financial reward, but they did demand economic security for their children, arguing to the ABCFM that they needed family stipends, subsidized private education, and the right to pass on to their children profits derived from the land. In the process, missionaries found acceptance among Hawaiian elites, including King Kamehameha III (reigned 1825–1854), who adopted Christianity, opened up ancestral lands to private ownership, and created a constitution limiting monarchal power. Kamehameha’s government—which included former missionaries—sold land to the missionaries at cheap prices to reward their service and keep them in the islands. Missionary children, who benefitted from these changes, were even more aggressive than their parents in pursuing political and economic success. Native Hawaiians noted the difference, arguing to the Hawaiian king in 1845 that white settler power had grown too strong. Hawaiian monarchs Kalākaua (r. 1874–1891) and Lili’uokalani (r. 1891–1893) retrenched against American missionary influence only to find that adult missionary descendents were willing to use violence...

Ancient history · Archaeology · Art · Colonialism · Drama · Empire · Ethnology · Genealogy · Identity (music) · Indigenous · Literature · Navajo · Population · Sociology · White (mutation) · Anthropology · Asian American and Pacific Histories · Demography · Gender Studies · History · Interdisciplinary Cultural and Social Studies

• The Middle Ground

  Open Access•Richard White, Richard G White•Middle Ground•2010

  Add to list

• The Absentee American

  Teresa Labov, Teresa G Labov et al.•International Migration Review•1993

  Add to list

• Gender and Memory in the Pacific

  Cari Costanzo Kapur•Amerasia Journal•2009

  Add to list

• Challenging the Status Quo

  Valerie Sutter, Cecil K Dotts et al.•History of Education Quarterly•1995

  Add to list

• Six Months in the Sandwich Islands

  Dorothy Middleton, Isabella L Bird•Geographical Journal•1965

  Add to list

• The American Frontier in Hawaii

  Open Access•John Wesley Coulter, Harold Whitman Bradley•Geographical Review•1944

  Add to list

• Children of the Land

  Alan Howard, A D Howard et al.•Man•1986

  Add to list