The Manuscript Tradition of Richard Ullerston’s Expositio canticorum Scripturae
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23213276 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Andrew Kraebel (corresponding author), A B Kraebel |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 49-82 |
| Publication date | 2013-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Mediaeval Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2033-5385 • E-ISSN: 2033-5393 |
| Publisher | Brepols Publishers NV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1484/j.tmj.1.103432 |
| OpenAlex | W2409353774 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
Though they are largely unedited and unstudied, several important biblical commentaries survive from late fourteenth- and early fifteenth-century Oxford. Among these is the gloss on the ferial canticles by Richard Ullerston, an Oxford theologian and influential ecclesiast in Chichele’s Church. The present essay offers an account of the manuscripts of this commentary, suggests how the text might be related to the lectures on the Psalms delivered by Ullerston in 1415, and (as its focus) determines the relationship that exists among the commentary’s various versions. Finally, the reasons why Ullerston may have sought to revise his text are explored.
Art · Fifteenth · Focus (optics) · Literature · Classics · History · Medieval Literature and History · Philosophy · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
| Citations per year | 0.25 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2022 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |