The origin of non-canonical case marking of subjects in Proto-Indo-European
Accusative, ergative, or semantic alignment
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 23213315 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Roland A Pooth (0000-0002-2674-4791, Ghent University, autor de correspondencia), Roland Pooth (Ghent University, St. Pietersnieuwstraat 33, Gent , Belgium), Peter Alexander Kerkhof (Leiden University, Rapenburg 70, EZ Leiden , Netherlands), Leonid Kulikov (Ghent University, St. Pietersnieuwstraat 33, Gent , Belgium), Леонид Куликов (0000-0002-7825-4866, Ghent University), Jóhanna Barðdal (0000-0003-0164-4249, Ghent University, St. Pietersnieuwstraat 33, Gent , Belgium) |
| Año | 2019 |
| Volumen | 124 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 245-264 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2019-09-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Indogermanische Forschungen (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0019-7262 • E-ISSN: 1613-0405 |
| Editorial | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/if-2019-0009 |
| OpenAlex | W2969231007 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 9 |
| Referencias citadas | 16 |
For a long time one of the most bewildering conundrums of Indo- European linguistics has been the issue of how to reconstruct the alignment system of this ancient language state, given the lack of distinction between s and o marking in the Proto-Indo-European neuter nouns and the problem of the Hittite ergative. An additional complication stems from the existence of argument structure constructions where the subject(-like) argument is marked in a different case than the nominative, like the accusative or the dative. Our aim with the present article is to fill two needs with one deed and offer a unified account of this century-long bone of contention. In contribution to the ongoing discussion in the field, we claim that a semantic alignment system, in the terms of Donohue & Wichmann (2008), might not only fit better with the morphological data that are currently reconstructed for the ancestral language, but also with the existence of non-canonically case-marked subjects in general (Barðdal, Bjarnadóttir, et al. 2013; Danesi, Johnson & Barðdal 2017).
Adjective · Argument (complex analysis) · Ergative case · Genitive case · Hittite language · Linguistics · Nominative case · Noun · Verb · Ancient Near East History · History · Linguistics and Cultural Studies · Linguistics and language evolution · Mathematics · Philosophy
Fresh views on the early history of Indo-European and its relation to Uralic
Reconstructing the evolution of Indo-European grammar
Non-nominative subjects in Latin and Ancient Greek
An “epoch in Historical Linguistics and Indo-European scholarship”
Alignment Change and the Emergence of the Thematic Conjugation from Proto‐Indo‐European to Indo‐European
Del proto-indoeuropeo a ipse e iste en latín arcaico
Evolutionary dynamics of Indo-European alignment patterns
Argument structure, conceptual metaphor and semantic change
Dependent-marked anticausatives in Old Norse-Icelandic
Vergleichende Syntax der indogermanischen Sprachen
Indo-European Linguistics
‘Hungering and Lusting for Women and Fleshly Delicacies’
The origin of the oblique-subject construction
C.C. Uhlenbeck on Indo-European, Uralic and Caucasian
The Perplexity of Dat-Nom Verbs in Icelandic
Pragmatic foundations of transitivity in Ao
The Quest for Cognates
Basic Linguistic Theory
Indo-European and the Indo-Europeans
Proto-Indo-European Syntax
Comparative Indo-European Linguistics
Auxiliary do
Oblique Subjects
Dative sickness
The Origin of NP Split Ergativity
| Obras citantes distintas | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,29 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 7 |