Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Animals in their Nature

A Case Study on Public Attitudes to Animals, Genetic Modification and ‘Nature’

Bibliographic Data

ID2321357
AuthorsPhil Macnaghten (0000-0002-6611-4583, Lancaster University, corresponding author)
Year2004
Volume38
Issue3
Pages533-551
Publication date2004-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0038-0385 • E-ISSN: 1469-8684
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0038038504043217
OpenAlexW2111292203
LanguageEN
Citations received46
References cited12

This article seeks to engage with contemporary debates on the social and ethical dimensions of genetically modified (GM) animals. Dominant policy ethical approaches and frameworks are criticized for failing radically to accommodate some of the most important dimensions of concern. Drawing on primary empirical data emphasizing existing embodied relationships to animals, the article analyses how people express ethical concern over GM animals, including their sense of the continuities and discontinuities between GM animals and those determined by conventional selective breeding practices. The findings suggest that GM animals are likely to become an issue of public controversy, especially in the animal testing domain, due to the ways in which they symbolize and give voice to underlying tensions between 'moral'and 'instrumental'approaches to animals.The article concludes that people reject GM animals as 'going against nature', and that such concerns reflect wider unease about science, about technological modernity, and about hubris

Embodied cognition · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Hubris · Modernity · Sociology · Crime, Deviance, and Social Control · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Human-Animal Interaction Studies · Philosophy

  • The Space Between

    Open Access•Jaime Banks, Autumn Edwards et al.•Cyberpsychology Behavior and…•2021

  • Attitudes towards the use of genetically modified animals in research

    Open Access•Catherine A Schuppli, Daniel M Weary•Public Understanding of Science•2010

  • Converging citizens? Nanotechnology and the political imaginary of public engagement in Brazil and the United Kingdom

    Open Access•Phil Macnaghten, Julia Silvia Guivant•Public Understanding of Science•2011

  • Imagined futures for livestock gene editing

    Open Access•Senna Middelveld, Phil Macnaghten et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2023

  • Public perceptions of animal experimentation across Europe

    Open Access•Fabienne Crettaz Von Roten•Public Understanding of Science•2013

  • Transgenic Animals, Biomedical Experiments, and "Progress"

    Kay Peggs•Journal of Animal Ethics•2013

  • The complexity of the gene and the precision of CRISPR

    Open Access•Esha Shah, David Ludwig et al.•Elementa Science of the…•2021

  • Gene editing of livestock

    Open Access•Senna Middelveld, Phil Macnaghten•Elementa Science of the…•2021

  • Narrative as a resource for inclusive governance

    Open Access•Phil Macnaghten, Julia Silvia Guivant•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2020

  • Transfiguring the Anthropocene

    Cleo Wöelfle-Hazard, John Y Cole•TSQ Transgender Studies Quarterly•2015

  • Narrative, Nanotechnology and the Accomplishment of Public Responses

    Open Access•Matthew Kearnes, Phil Macnaghten et al.•NanoEthics•2014

  • The Opposite of Human Enhancement

    Open Access•Paul Β Thompson•NanoEthics•2008

  • All things weird and scary’

    Sarah R Davies, Matthew Kearnes et al.•Culture and Religion•2009

  • Aquaculture

    Anne Katrin Schlag•Journal of Risk Research•2010

  • Moral “Lock-In” in Responsible Innovation

    Open Access•M R N Bruijnis, Vincent Blok et al.•Journal of Agricultural and…•2015

  • Using Breeding Technologies to Improve Farm Animal Welfare

    Open Access•Koen Kramer, F L B Meijboom•Journal of Agricultural and…•2021

  • Genetically Modifying Livestock for Improved Welfare

    Open Access•Adam Shriver, Emilie McConnachie•Journal of Agricultural and…•2018

  • Fundamental Moral Attitudes to Animals and Their Role in Judgment

    Open Access•Nina E Cohen, Nina Cohen et al.•Journal of Agricultural and…•2009

  • Is CRISPR an Ethical Game Changer

    Open Access•Marcus Schultz-Bergin•Journal of Agricultural and…•2018

  • The Pedigree Dog Breeding Debate in Ethics and Practice

    Open Access•Bernice Bovenkerk, H J Nijland•Journal of Agricultural and…•2017

  • A Public Survey on Handling Male Chicks in the Dutch Egg Sector

    Open Access•Bart Gremmen, M R N Bruijnis et al.•Journal of Agricultural and…•2018

  • Social Acceptance of Dairy Farming

    Open Access•B K Boogaard, B B Bock et al.•Journal of Agricultural and…•2010

  • Are Scientists Right and Non-Scientists Wrong? Reflections on Discussions of GM

    Open Access•Jan Deckers•Journal of Agricultural and…•2005

  • Ethical Issues and Potential Stakeholder Priorities Associated with the Application of Genomic Technologies Applied to Animal Production Systems

    Open Access•David Coles, Lynn J Frewer et al.•Journal of Agricultural and…•2015

  • Constructing the Biotech Nonhuman Animal

    Sari Ung‐Lanki, Sari Ung-Lanki•Society and Animals•2014

  • Conceptions of Equine Welfare in Finnish Horse Magazines

    Nora Schuurman•Society and Animals•2013

  • Attitudes on Animal Research Predict Acceptance of Genetic Modification Technologies by University Undergraduates

    Kara I Gabriel, Brook H Rutledge et al.•Society and Animals•2012

  • From Bio to Nano

    Matthew Kearnes, Robin Grove‐white et al.•Science as Culture•2006

  • Anticipatory Governance

    Alison Harvey, B Salter•Science as Culture•2012

  • Agricultural practices, ecosystem services and sustainability in High Nature Value farmland

    Open Access•A Bernués, Elena Tello-García et al.•Land Use Policy•2016

  • Genetic techniques for livestock breeding

    Open Access•David Gibbs, Lewis Holloway et al.•Geoforum•2009

  • The lore of low methane livestock

    Open Access•Ann Bruce•Life Sciences Society and Policy•2013

  • Boosted bodies

    Open Access•Lewis Holloway, Carol Morris•Geoforum•2008

  • Beasts and boundaries

    Open Access•Pru Hobson-West•Qualitative Sociology Review•2007

  • Researching Technoscientific Concerns in the Making

    Open Access•Phil Macnaghten•Environment and Planning A…•2010

  • Nanotechnology, Governance, and Public Deliberation

    Open Access•Phil Macnaghten, Matthew Kearnes et al.•Science Communication•2005

  • Country Life

    Open Access•Christopher Bear, Lewis Holloway•Geography Compass•2015

  • The Sacred and the Profane

    Open Access•Gail Davies•Environment and Planning A…•2006

  • Engaging nanotechnologies

    Open Access•Phil Macnaghten•Ambiente & sociedade•2009

  • Performing Expertise in Human-Animal Relationships

    Open Access•Nora Schuurman, Alex Franklin•Environment and Planning D…•2015

  • L'ambivalence des relations humain-animal

    Emmanuel Gouabault, Claudine Burton-Jeangros•Sociologie et sociétés•2010

  • Understanding Relations between Science, Politics, and the Public

    Open Access•Michiel P M M De Krom, Joost Dessein et al.•Sociologia Ruralis•2014

  • Towards an anticipatory public engagement methodology

    Open Access•Phil Macnaghten•Qualitative Research•2021

  • Multi-species sociology of the body

    Open Access•Kay Peggs•Journal of Sociology•2018

  • Multispecies Scholarship and Encounters

    Open Access•Rhoda Wilkie•Sociology•2015

  • Ethical Boundary-work in the Animal Research Laboratory

    Open Access•Pru Hobson-West•Sociology•2012

  • Natural relations

    Ted Benton•Natural relations•1993

  • Man and the natural world

    Keith Thomas•Man and the natural world•1984

  • Meat

    Nick Fiddes•Meat•2004

  • Drawing the line

    Open Access•Anne Kerr, Sarah Cunningham-Burley et al.•Public Understanding of Science•1998

  • Animals and us

    Open Access•Ted Benton•History of the Human Sciences•1992

  • Creating Public Alienation

    Brian Wynne•Science as Culture•2001

  • Nature and Social Theory

    Anita Franklin, Adrian Franklin•Nature and Social Theory•2001

  • Contested Natures

    Phil Macnaghten, John Urry•Contested Natures•1999

  • Moral panic versus the risk society

    Open Access•Sheldon Ungar•British Journal of Sociology•2001

  • Neo-Darwinian Leisures, the Body and Nature

    Open Access•Anita Franklin, Adrian Franklin•Body & Society•2001

Unique citing works46
Citations per year2,19
Citation span2005 - 2023 (19)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 46

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae