Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Postulate of Immortality in Kant

To What Extent is it Culturally Conditioned?

Bibliographic Data

ID23213731
AuthorsEdward A Beach (corresponding author)
Year2008
Volume58
Issue4
Pages492-523
Publication date2008-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophy East and West (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0031-8221 • E-ISSN: 1529-1898
PublisherProject MUSE (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1353/pew.0.0024
OpenAlexW2046025944
LanguageEN
References cited10

Kant's noncognitive argument based on practical reason claims that moral considerations alone suffice to justify the idea of personal immortality as a postulate. Some recent objections are considered here that have charged him with overstepping his own distinction between phenomenon and noumenon. After examining the arguments, Kant is exonerated of having violated his own principles. More troubling, however, is the peculiarity involved in postulating an infinite progression toward a goal whose attainment, by hypothesis, would undermine the very foundations of morality (which for Kant always requires the agonistic condition of struggling to improve one's lower nature). It is argued that this paradox necessitates a reexamination of some tacit cultural presuppositions underlying Kant's conception of the soul. Finally, an examination is made of the thought of Kitarō Nishida, whose Zen Buddhist–inspired dialectic of the basho (logical "place") provides an alternative perspective from which to reconsider the postulate of immortality. Nishida, like Kant, rigorously maintains the phenomenonnoumenon distinction, yet his examination of ethics leads him to postulate an eventual sublation of the "soul" principle. It is concluded that Kant's postulate of immortality, while plausible enough on its own terms, is limited by a Western cultural bias and therefore fails in the end to be compelling.

Argument (complex analysis) · Autonomy · Dialectic · Epistemology · Heteronomy · Immortality · Morality · Noumenon · Omniscience · Phronesis · Practical reason · Soul · Theology · Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations · Law · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · War, Ethics, and Justification

  • A Source Book in Indian Philosophy

    S Radhakrishnan, Charles A Moore•Source Book in Indian Philosophy•1957

  • The Unimportance of Kant's Highest Good

    Thomas Auxter•Journal of the history of…•1979

  • Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone

    Stephen Seabaugh•Kant on History and Religion•2017

  • Zen and Philosophy

    Michiko Yusa•Zen and Philosophy•2002

  • Wahrheit Und Methode

    Hans-Georg Gadamer, Hans‐georg Gadamer•Bijdragen•1973

  • The Impossibility of Kantian Immortality

    Open Access•J J Macintosh•Dialogue•1980

  • The Intelligible World

    Marilyn Barlow, M C Barlow et al.•The American Journal of Psychology•1932

  • An inquiry into the good

    Nishida Kitaro, Kitaro Nishida•An inquiry into the good•1990

  • Critique of Practical Reason (Hackett Classics Series)

    Immanuel Kant, Werner S Pluhar•Critique of Practical Reason…•2002

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae