"Authorized Guardians"
The Polemics Of Academic Scholars Of Jewish Mysticism Against Kabbalah Practitioners
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23213767 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bernard Hu (0000-0002-0244-1630, corresponding author), Boaz Huss |
| Year | 2007 |
| Pages | 81-103 |
| Publication date | 2007-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Polemical Encounters (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Brill (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1163/ej.9789004162570.i-326.27 |
| OpenAlex | W824327230 |
| ISBN | 9789004162570 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
In this chapter the author examines the polemics of academic scholars against contemporary kabbalah practitioners, and analyzes its social and cultural significance. He suggests that the polemical stance of these academic scholars is an expression of the ideological and theological perspective of scholars engaged in the field of Jewish mysticism, who aspire not only to study kabbalah as a historical and sociological phenomenon, but also to determine its symbolic value and control its increasing cultural capital in the modern world. He claims that the polemics of the modern scholars against contemporary kabbalists is an expression of their claim to be the authorized guardians of kabbalah in the modern world. Following the growing interest in kabbalah in non-Jewish European culture, Jewish intellectuals in both Western and Eastern Europe reaffirmed the value of kabbalah and Hasidism.Keywords: Jewish mysticism; jewish thinkers; kabbalah; Polemics
Ideology · Jewish mysticism · Judaism · Kabbalah · Mysticism · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Theology · Value (mathematics) · Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies · Law · Philosophy · Religious studies
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,33 |
| Citation span | 2014 - 2021 (8) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |