Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Emma Uprichard
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Goldsmiths, University of London, UK
ANO 2013
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Sociology
ISSN 0038-0385
E-ISSN 1469-8684
EDITORA SAGE Publications
DOI 10.1177/0038038512441279
CITAÇÕES 3
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 5132ec54b43ba3253ae91154945f4dce

Resumo

Recently, Savage and Burrows argued that there is an 'empirical crisis' in sociology. They concluded that sociologists should abandon a focus on causality for descriptions that 'link narrative, numbers, and images'. This article takes up their challenge by using Wordle to depict the changing focus in academic articles on food and eating since 1950. Using this illustrative example, it is argued that their call to abandon causality is problematic for three reasons. First, interpreting description necessarily depends on a causal framework. Second, since description becomes part of a mode of production in which context and meaning are inscribed, the question is not whether to reject causality in favour of description, but rather what kinds of description help to explore causality. Third, going beyond description is ethically advantageous for a critical sociological programme. The article concludes that, contrary to Savage and Burrows, description and causality go hand in hand.

Ferramentas