Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) S. Friedman , M. Taylor , A. Miles , M. Savage , D. Laurison , Helene Snee , Fiona Devine , Nick Cunningham
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) London School of Economics, UK, The University of Manchester
ANO 2015
TIPO Artigo
PERIÓDICO Sociology
ISSN 0038-0385
E-ISSN 1469-8684
EDITORA SAGE Publications
DOI 10.1177/0038038514536635
CITAÇÕES 18
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-18
MD5 52f00ac3a4a6f76d7f8e82862bc7da3a

Resumo

This article responds to the critical reception of the arguments made about social class in Savage et al. (2013). It emphasises the need to disentangle different strands of debate so as not to conflate four separate issues: (a) the value of the seven class model proposed; (b) the potential of the large web survey – the Great British Class Survey (GBCS) for future research; (c) the value of Bourdieusian perspectives for re-energising class analysis; and (d) the academic and public reception to the GBCS itself. We argue that, in order to do justice to the full potential of the GBCS, we need a concept of class which does not reduce it to a technical measure of a single variable and which recognises how multiple axes of inequality can crystallise as social classes. Whilst recognising the limitations of what we are able to claim on the basis of the GBCS, we argue that the seven classes defined in Savage et al. (2013) have sociological resonance in pointing to the need to move away from a focus on class boundaries at the middle reaches of the class structure towards an analysis of the power of elite formation.

Ferramentas