Commodity Content in a General Input-Output Model: A Comment
Commodity Content in a General Input-Output Model
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23229846 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Naoki Yoshihara (0000-0002-0804-787X, Hitotsubashi University, corresponding author), Roberto Veneziani (0000-0001-6431-0145, Hitotsubashi University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 740-748 |
| Publication date | 2010-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Metroeconomica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0026-1386 • E-ISSN: 1467-999X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-999x.2010.04091.x |
| OpenAlex | W2116107160 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 5 |
This paper critically analyses the approach to the determination of values, or commodity contents, developed by Fujimoto and Opocher in 2009. Even setting aside various problematic definitional issues, the broader implications of the approach for classical theory are unclear. First, the value-theoretic definitions of skill differentials and bads capture at best necessary conditions and it is unlikely that such definitions can be provided by focusing only on the technological data of the economy. Second, the approach has various interesting implications concerning the relation between productiveness and exploitation that directly contradict some of the authors' claims.
Aside · Commodity · Economics · Market economy · Mathematical economics · Microeconomics · Neoclassical economics · Positive economics · Relation (database) · Value (mathematics) · Computer Science · Economic Theory and Institutions · Economic Theory and Policy · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism
Marx's Economics
A Refutation of the Commodity Exploitation Theorem
Commodity Content in a General Input–output Model
TGF-β Prodomain Alignments Reveal Unexpected Cysteine Conservation Consistent with Phylogenetic Predictions of Cross-Subfamily Heterodimerization
A General Theory of Exploitation and Class
| Citations per year | 0.38 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2013 - 2018 (6) |
| Highly cited | No |