MacBeth and the Background of Jesuitical Equivocation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23230563 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Frank L Huntley (University of Michigan, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1964 |
| Volume | 79 |
| Issue | 4-Part1 |
| Pages | 390-400 |
| Publication date | 1964-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0030-8129 • E-ISSN: 1938-1530 |
| Publisher | Modern Language Association (MLA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/460744 |
| OpenAlex | W2314496867 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
The drunken porter in Macbeth says: “Faith, here's an equivocator, that could swear in both the scales against either scale; who committed treason enough for God's sake, yet could not equivocate to heaven. O, come in, equivocator” (ii.iii). The speech has often been used as one of the means of dating the play because “equivocation” became notorious at the trial and execution of Father Henry Garnett that followed the uncovering of the Gunpowder Plot of November 1605. Also, it has been well recognized that equivocation is a major theme in the play, both in the narrow sense of common duplicity and in the larger sense of a blur between appearance and reality. There is equivocation between Macbeth as a man and Macbeth as a woman, and it is Lady Macbeth who cries out to become unsexed. The play is filled with equivocal appearances—women with beards, Macbeth in “borrowed robes,” day turned into night, a peaceful castle without and a burning cauldron of evil within. “All nature's germens” tumble together, and “the whole frame of things” becomes “disjoint.” This paper does not deny these usual interpretations of equivocation.
Art · Betrayal · Epistemology · Equivocation · Faith · Literature · Plot (graphics) · Psychoanalysis · Theology · Early Modern Women Writers · Historical Studies of British Isles · Philosophy · Psychology · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.06 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1990 - 2011 (22) |
| Highly cited | No |