Clitic doubling from Ancient to Asia Minor Greek
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23232877 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mark Janse (0000-0002-2824-3894, Ghent University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Pages | 165-202 |
| Publication date | 2008-11-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Clitic doubling in Balkan languages (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | John Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1075/la.130.11jan |
| OpenAlex | W2317172049 |
| ISBN | 9789027255136 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
In Modern Greek, clitic doubling is a grammatical device that marks clitic doubled object NPs as topics. Clitic doubling involving the fronting of the clitic doubled NP is called topicalization or, if combined with a boundary pause, topic left-dislocation. Topic left-dislocation is obligatory in the presence of a preverbal focused NP. Clitic doubling involving the backing of the clitic doubled NP is called backgrounding or, if combined with a boundary pause, topic right-dislocation. Right-dislocated topics are interpreted as an afterthought. In Ancient Greek, clitic doubling was an occasional mnemotechnic device to clarify the referent of a left-dislocated topic usually separated by an intervening clause from the verb on which it depended. Topic right-dislocation existed in Ancient Greek as a device to clarify or specify the referent of a clitic pronoun. The grammaticalization of clitic doubling can be traced back to the use of hanging topics, in which case the doubling clitic was needed to specify the grammatical relation of the corresponding hanging topic as direct or indirect object. The construction was grammaticalized in the Medieval period, when clitic doubling positively marked clitic doubled NPs as topics. In Asia Minor Greek, clitic doubling serves exactly the same purposes as in Medieval and Standard Modern Greek. Turkish interference appears in the existence of a definite and an indefinite accusative to mark topic and focus respectively and possibly the preponderance of SOV as the unmarked order.
Clitic · Linguistics · Modern Greek · Object (grammar) · Pronoun · Referent · Verb · History · Lexicography and Language Studies · Linguistics and language evolution · linguistics and terminology studies · Philosophy
Diachronic evidence against source-oriented explanation in typology
The pragmatics of pronominal clitics and propositional attitudes
Variation in word formation in situations of language contact
The History and Etymology of Cappadocian Fšáx ‘Child’, Pharasiot Fšáxi ‘Boy’
The distribution of object clitic pronouns in the Grottaferrata manuscript of Digenis Akritis
Between VO and OV in Arabic and Aramaic
The evolution of the Ancient Greek deverbal pragmatic markers áge, íthi and phére
Understanding Dialectal Variation in Contact Scenarios Through Dialectometry
Connectivity in left-dislocation and the composition of the left periphery
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.64 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2025 (14) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |