Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Clitic doubling from Ancient to Asia Minor Greek

Bibliographic Data

ID23232877
AuthorsMark Janse (0000-0002-2824-3894, Ghent University, corresponding author)
Year2008
Pages165-202
Publication date2008-11-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeCHAPTER
VenueClitic doubling in Balkan languages (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1075/la.130.11jan
OpenAlexW2317172049
ISBN9789027255136
LanguageEN
Citations received9

In Modern Greek, clitic doubling is a grammatical device that marks clitic doubled object NPs as topics. Clitic doubling involving the fronting of the clitic doubled NP is called topicalization or, if combined with a boundary pause, topic left-dislocation. Topic left-dislocation is obligatory in the presence of a preverbal focused NP. Clitic doubling involving the backing of the clitic doubled NP is called backgrounding or, if combined with a boundary pause, topic right-dislocation. Right-dislocated topics are interpreted as an afterthought. In Ancient Greek, clitic doubling was an occasional mnemotechnic device to clarify the referent of a left-dislocated topic usually separated by an intervening clause from the verb on which it depended. Topic right-dislocation existed in Ancient Greek as a device to clarify or specify the referent of a clitic pronoun. The grammaticalization of clitic doubling can be traced back to the use of hanging topics, in which case the doubling clitic was needed to specify the grammatical relation of the corresponding hanging topic as direct or indirect object. The construction was grammaticalized in the Medieval period, when clitic doubling positively marked clitic doubled NPs as topics. In Asia Minor Greek, clitic doubling serves exactly the same purposes as in Medieval and Standard Modern Greek. Turkish interference appears in the existence of a definite and an indefinite accusative to mark topic and focus respectively and possibly the preponderance of SOV as the unmarked order.

Clitic · Linguistics · Modern Greek · Object (grammar) · Pronoun · Referent · Verb · History · Lexicography and Language Studies · Linguistics and language evolution · linguistics and terminology studies · Philosophy

  • Diachronic evidence against source-oriented explanation in typology

    Open Access•Ilja A Seržant, Dariya Rafiyenko•Language Dynamics and Change•2020

  • The pragmatics of pronominal clitics and propositional attitudes

    Alessandro Capone•Intercultural Pragmatics•2013

  • Variation in word formation in situations of language contact

    Open Access•Dimitra Melissaropoulou•Language Sciences•2016

  • The History and Etymology of Cappadocian Fšáx ‘Child’, Pharasiot Fšáxi ‘Boy’

    Open Access•Mark Janse, Johan Vandewalle•Transactions of the Philological…•2020

  • The distribution of object clitic pronouns in the Grottaferrata manuscript of Digenis Akritis

    Open Access•Jorie Soltic•Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies•2012

  • Between VO and OV in Arabic and Aramaic

    Open Access•Paul M Noorlander, Dorota Molin et al.•Studies in Language•2025

  • The evolution of the Ancient Greek deverbal pragmatic markers áge, íthi and phére

    Samuel Zakowski•Journal of Historical Pragmatics•2018

  • Understanding Dialectal Variation in Contact Scenarios Through Dialectometry

    Open Access•Stavros Bompola, Dimitra Melissaropoulou•Languages•2025

  • Connectivity in left-dislocation and the composition of the left periphery

    Dana Ott, Dennis Ott•Linguistic Variation•2015

Unique citing works9
Citations per year0.64
Citation span2012 - 2025 (14)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOILibgenOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae