The Son’s Assumption of a Human Nature

This article seeks to bring some clarity to the controversial question of whether the Son of God assumed a fallen or unfallen human nature. We briefly survey conflicting historical assessments and continuing perplexity related to this question. Next we argue that much contemporary confusion can only be removed by first noting how John Calvin and Reformation catechisms tended to understand the idea of Jesus’ sinlessness. In conclusion, from the vast literature on the subject we outline seven points which may serve contemporary reflection on this question by showing where the two views agree, disagree, or show internal divisions.

CLARITY · Confusion · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Perplexity · Psychoanalysis · Subject (documents) · Philosophy · Psychology · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity