Divorce and Legal Aid
A False Hypothesis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2324320 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert Chester (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1972 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 205-216 |
| Publication date | 1972-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0038-0385 • E-ISSN: 1469-8684 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/003803857200600203 |
| OpenAlex | W1981081221 |
| Language | EN |
This paper examines the proposition advanced by some commentators that divorce petitioning in England and Wales fluctuates in accordance with the changing real value of legal aid. Direct evidence, from divorce figures and details of legal aid provision, is examined and shown not to fit the hypothesis. Indirect evidence drawn from Magistrates' Court proceedings and income provision by the National Assistance Board also fails to support the proposition. It is concluded that the proposition is false, and that increased divorce petitioning reflects more fundamental social changes than amendments to legal aid provision
California Proposition 13 · Economics · Epistemology · Law and economics · Management · Political science · Proposition · Sociology · Value (mathematics) · Value proposition · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Law · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Legal principles and applications
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |