Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Divorce and Legal Aid

A False Hypothesis

Bibliographic Data

ID2324320
AuthorsRobert Chester (corresponding author)
Year1972
Volume6
Issue2
Pages205-216
Publication date1972-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0038-0385 • E-ISSN: 1469-8684
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/003803857200600203
OpenAlexW1981081221
LanguageEN

This paper examines the proposition advanced by some commentators that divorce petitioning in England and Wales fluctuates in accordance with the changing real value of legal aid. Direct evidence, from divorce figures and details of legal aid provision, is examined and shown not to fit the hypothesis. Indirect evidence drawn from Magistrates' Court proceedings and income provision by the National Assistance Board also fails to support the proposition. It is concluded that the proposition is false, and that increased divorce petitioning reflects more fundamental social changes than amendments to legal aid provision

California Proposition 13 · Economics · Epistemology · Law and economics · Management · Political science · Proposition · Sociology · Value (mathematics) · Value proposition · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Law · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Legal principles and applications

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae