Role Theory in Foreign Policy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23247277 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marijke Breuning (0000-0002-9981-3989, University of North Texas, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Publication date | 2017-05-24 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | Civil Disobedience and Conscientious Objection (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University PressNew York, NY (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.334 |
| OpenAlex | W2727223002 |
| ISBN | 9780190228637 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 18 |
| References cited | 4 |
Role theory first emerged as an approach to the study of foreign policy with the seminal work of Holsti, who argued that decision makers’ conceptions of their state’s role on the world stage influenced that state’s foreign policy behavior. Holsti’s approach was ahead of its time. The potential of role theory to contribute to the agent-structure debate has not always been appreciated. In fact, early research employing role theory often maintained a close connection to structural theories of international relations, especially among U.S.-based scholars. In the last decade or so, there has been a renewed interest in role theory that differs from earlier work in that it more clearly connects with psychological approaches to foreign policy analysis. It also takes more seriously the domestic sources of role theory through inquiry into horizontal and vertical role contestation. Much of this new work intersects with constructivism, although it remains grounded in empiricism. As foreign policy analysis increasingly seeks to understand the foreign policies of a broader array of states—including smaller states that face significant constraints on their ability to act in the international arena—role theory provides an attractive framework. Its focus on decision makers’ conceptions of their state’s role in international politics enhances the ability to make sense of the foreign policies of a wider array of states in the global arena. In essence, role theory allows foreign policy analysis to move beyond a U.S.-centric or global-north-centric field to become more broadly comparative.
Economics · Epistemology · Field (mathematics) · Foreign policy · Foreign policy analysis · International relations · International relations theory · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Sociology · State (computer science) · Computer Science · European Union Policy and Governance · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
The effects of the Russia–Ukraine war on Ethiopian foreign policy roles
Italian diplomacy and the Ukrainian crisis
British foreign policy after Brexit
Cyber Security Politics
National Roles and Foreign Policy
Leader Influence in Role Selection Choices
Role Dissonance in Foreign Policy
A Debate of the Highest Order
Turning to Rabat
Constructive Role Ambiguity and How Russia Couldn’t ‘Get Away’ with Its 2022 Ukrainian Invasion
China's Role in Global Development Finance
Role dynamics and trust in France-China coopetition
China in the Mediterranean
China and Egypt’s comprehensive strategic partnership in the Xi-sisi era
Continuity or change? A role-theoretical analysis of China’s developing country role (2015–2025)
The curious case of vandals
Multidirectional altercasting among middle powers
Cybersicherheit und Rollenwandel
| Citations per year | 2.25 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Highly cited | No |