Peace, Liberty, and Democracy
Realists and Liberals Contest a Legacy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 23249094 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael W Doyle (0000-0002-3560-3966, corresponding author), Michael Doyle (0000-0003-2083-8575) |
| Year | 2000 |
| Pages | 21-40 |
| Publication date | 2000-08-31 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | CHAPTER |
| Venue | American Democracy Promotion (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University PressOxford (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/0199240973.003.0002 |
| OpenAlex | W2480899059 |
| ISBN | 9780199240975 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
Examines the liberal peace thesis from the perspective of both the liberal and realist traditions in international relations. It compares the way both schools of thought envisage the connection between peace, liberty, and democracy. It differentiates among three distinct theoretical traditions of liberalism—Lockean, Kantian, and Schumpeterian—and explains their somewhat different conceptions of world politics.
Classical liberalism · CONTEST · Democracy · Environmental ethics · International relations · Law and economics · Liberal democracy · Liberalism · Perspective (graphical) · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Philosophy · War, Ethics, and Justification
The normative challenge of interaction
Democracia cosmopolita versus política internacional
Segurança internacional e normatividade
The interaction of interests and norms in international democracy promotion
Iron Fists in Iron Gloves’
Safe over similar? A structural interpretation of changing patterns in U.S. democracy promotion
Bill Clinton’s “new partnership” anecdote
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,35 |
| Citation span | 2006 - 2025 (20) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |