Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Science and Family in the Great Embryo Debate

Bibliographic Data

ID2327561
AuthorsMichael Mulkay (corresponding author)
Year1994
Volume28
Issue3
Pages699-715
Publication date1994-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0038-0385 • E-ISSN: 1469-8684
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0038038594028003004
PMID11658100
OpenAlexW1966462818
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited8

The public debate following the Warnock Report has furnished the interpretative context in which embryo research and the technology of assisted reproduction have begun to be institutionalised in Britain. Social scientists have been quick to examine this debate and to assess how far it has fostered changes in the established patterns of, and ideals of, kinship and family relationships. In the present study documentary evidence is used to argue that the central theme of the public debate was not so much the new forms of social parenthood made possible by assisted reproduction, on which analysts have tended to concentrate, as the supposed threat to the continuation of ordinary family life posed by what many people saw as the creation of real, living persons outside the kinship system. Widespread controversy over this issue was generated by the existence of long-standing and contrasting definitions of family membership. Nevertheless, all the major groupings involved in the controversy justified their views and their practical proposals by linking them to the maintenance of the conventional, small scale, heterosexual family unit. Thus the overall effect of the public debate has not been to promote widespread consideration of new kinship patterns, but to ensure that the research and technology of assisted reproduction have been accepted and bureaucratically organised as social practices consonant with a conservative ideal of normal family life

Biology · Context (archaeology) · Environmental ethics · Ideal (ethics) · Kinship · Political science · Reproduction · Social reproduction · Social science · Sociology · Theme (computing) · Anthropology · Ecology · Gender Studies · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · Law · Reproductive Health and Technologies

  • Parliamentary Ambivalence in Relation to Embryo Research

    Open Access•Michael Mulkay•Social Studies of Science•1995

  • Representing the family

    James Cornford, Susan Baine et al.•Policy & Politics•2013

  • Changing minds about embryo research

    Open Access•Michael Mulkay•Public Understanding of Science•1994

  • Political parties, parliamentary lobbies and embryo research

    Open Access•Michael Mulkay•Public Understanding of Science•1995

  • Excluding indigenous bioethical concerns when regulating frozen embryo storage

    Open Access•R Fitzgerald, Michael Legge et al.•Reproductive Biomedicine &…•2019

  • Cloning sensations

    Open Access•M Horst•Public Understanding of Science•2005

  • Gendered health policies and a women's movement

    Open Access•Thomas Acton, Susan Caffrey et al.•Health & Place•1998

  • Back to the future? New genetics and disabled people

    Open Access•Tom Shakespeare•Critical Social Policy•1995

  • The Transcendence and Non-Discursivity of the Lifeworld

    Open Access•Wing-Chung Ho•Human Studies•2008

  • Frankenstein and the Debate Over Embryo Research

    Open Access•Michael Mulkay•Science Technology & Human Values•1996

  • A compreensão jurídica, médica e "leiga" do embrião em Portugal

    Open Access•Susana Silva, Helena Machado•Interface - Comunicação Saúde…•2009

  • Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood

    Kristin Luker•Abortion and the Politics of…•2019

  • Embryos in the news

    Open Access•Michael Mulkay•Public Understanding of Science•1994

  • A Question of Life

    Elizabeth Kingdom•Disability Handicap & Society•1986

  • Reproductive technologies

    Open Access•Mary Warnock•Futures•1989

  • Technologies of Procreation

    Jeanette Edwards, Franklin et al.•Technologies of Procreation•2005

  • The Moral Character of Mad Scientists

    Open Access•Christopher P Toumey•Science Technology & Human Values•1992

  • Changing Human Reproduction

    Helena Ragone, Meg Stacey•Man•1994

  • Concepts of parenthood

    Open Access•Fenella Cannell•American Ethnologist•1990

Unique citing works11
Citations per year0,34
Citation span1994 - 2019 (26)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae