Dilemmas of Power in Post-Graduate Practice

A Comment on Research Training

Bibliographic Data

ID2327686
AuthorsE Stina Lyons, E Stina Lyon (corresponding author)
Year1995
Volume29
Issue3
Pages531-540
Publication date1995-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0038-0385 • E-ISSN: 1469-8684
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0038038595029003009
OpenAlexW2134749120
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited15

Recent policy discussions on research methods training and the funding of post-graduate students in sociology have not paid adequate attention to the conflicts and contradictions experienced by students working on projects which are sponsored, or simply 'housed', by external funders, employers and information 'users'. This discussion note argues that lack of clarity in the use of concepts such as 'practical research', 'research practice' and 'reflective practitioner', and the uneven power relations between students, supervisors, funders and employers, create situations where students have to become more adept at pragmatically handling evidence than at learning how to collect it in an independent and scholarly way. The changing nature of professional practice within organisations, increasingly characterised by growing managerialism and hostility towards open information, contributes to the dilemmas faced by students, as do structural pressures on the curriculum facing higher education institutions themselves. These are issues which should be of concern to the sociological profession as a whole

CLARITY · Curriculum · Engineering ethics · Hostility · Managerialism · Pedagogy · Political science · Power (physics · Public relations · Sociology · Training (meteorology · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Psychology · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub